Search results

Mark S. Glynn is an Associate Professor of Marketing at the Business and Law Faculty, AUT University, Auckland, New Zealand. He obtained his PhD in marketing from the University of Auckland. In 2006, Mark won the Emerald/EFMD best thesis award for outstanding doctoral research in the category of marketing strategy. His research experience is in the areas of branding, relationship marketing, business-to-business marketing, and retail channels. Mark Glynn's business-to-business research appears in Industrial Marketing Management, the European Journal of Marketing, Journal of Business Research, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Advances in Business Marketing & Purchasing, Australian Marketing Journal, and Marketing Theory. He also serves on the editorial boards of Industrial Marketing Management and the Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing.

Global awareness and international information exchange have long been highlighted by academia as a principal component of continued business competitiveness. In order to examine the extent to which academics practise what they preach, key marketing journals in Europe, Japan and the USA were examined to determine the level of international authorship of their content. While the European Journal of Marketing and the Journal of International Marketing were found to have substantial international representation among their authors, most other marketing journals had only limited international input. Recommendations are made on how to increase the international cross‐fertilization of marketing knowledge.

With the publication of Volume 10 Number 4 1995, the Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing (JBIM) celebrated its tenth anniversary. Over the years, JBIM has emerged as a leading journal in the area of business‐to‐business marketing. To commemorate this achievement, examines the contributions of the Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing to the marketing field, in general, and to the more specific sub‐area of business‐to‐business marketing in particular. To accomplish this, reviews the origins of JBIM and provides an analysis of the nature of the articles published and contributors’ backgrounds. In addition, presents an overview of the journal’s history, contributions and content, along with some interesting summary statistics. Finally, discusses JBIM’s past and present objectives, as well as its current positioning, recent developments and future directions.

The purpose of this study is to examine the internet marketing literature to determine how internet marketing research has evolved in terms of quantity, content, and publication outlets. In addition, the paper identifies important trends in the internet marketing literature and provides a view of the research gaps and expected topical areas of interest.

A content analysis was performed on approximately 1,400 internet‐related marketing articles identified by searching the ABI/INFORM database. A total of 902 peer‐reviewed internet marketing articles appearing in nearly 80 different journals were identified. The study revealed that 60 percent of the internet research had been published in the last three years. The three most researched internet marketing areas were consumer behavior, internet strategy, and internet communications. The topics with the highest growth over the past two years were research issues and consumer search. Over the past 15 years, 14 articles appeared in the top three marketing journals.

The article identified important trends in the internet marketing research to provide future direction, particularly in terms of research gaps and expected topical areas of interest. The three major research areas that are likely to grow in the next few years are: consumer trust pertaining to the internet, the use of the internet by consumers for marketing related activities, and where is the internet headed in terms of integrating strategies?

The study provides both academics and practitioners with an updated review of the internet marketing literature along with a sense of how internet marketing research is evolving.

This study aims to examine marketing trends spanning a period of 26 years to scrutinize North American influence in marketing research, as well as enhance comprehension of interdisciplinary marketing knowledge and identify prominent scholars, universities, countries, and articles that warrant further scholarly exploration.

This paper uses bibliometric methods to analyze the publications of eight top-tier journals (Journal of Marketing, Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Marketing Science, Journal of Retailing, Journal of Consumer Psychology and International Journal of Research in Marketing) between 1996 and 2021, as found in the Scopus database.

The findings indicate that North American hegemony in the marketing discipline continues and that the impact of marketing on other disciplines remains controversial. Some universities have a deeply rooted tradition of marketing departments. Some articles from 26 years ago are still frequently cited.

The study covers the period from 1996 to 2021. It includes only articles, uses a single database and is cross-sectional. Future research should explore longer time periods by using various databases for comprehensive analysis.

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study constitutes one of the first attempts to understand the scholarly contributions of the marketing discipline by considering eight top-tier journals.

Esta investigación examina las tendencias de marketing durante un período de 26 años para analizar la influencia norteamericana en la investigación de marketing, así como para mejorar la comprensión del conocimiento interdisciplinario en marketing e identificar destacados académicos, universidades, países y artículos que merecen una mayor exploración académica.

Este documento emplea métodos bibliométricos para analizar las publicaciones de ocho revistas de primer nivel (Journal of Marketing, Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Marketing Science, Journal of Retailing, Journal of Consumer Psychology e International Journal of Research in Marketing) entre 1996 y 2021, según se encuentran en la base de datos de Scopus.

Los resultados indican que la hegemonía norteamericana en la disciplina del marketing continúa y que el impacto del marketing en otras disciplinas sigue siendo controvertido. Algunas universidades tienen una tradición arraigada en los departamentos de marketing. Algunos artículos de hace 26 años todavía son citados con frecuencia.

Este estudio constituye uno de los primeros intentos de comprender las contribuciones académicas de la disciplina del marketing considerando ocho revistas de primer nivel.

El estudio cubre el período de 1996 a 2021. Incluye solo artículos, utiliza una sola base de datos y es transversal. Futuras investigaciones deberían explorar períodos más largos de tiempo empleando diversas bases de datos para un análisis completo.

本研究调查了跨越26年的市场营销趋势, 以探讨北美在市场营销研究中的影响, 并增进对跨学科市场营销知识的理解, 识别值得进一步探索的杰出学者、大学、国家和文章。

本文采用文献计量学方法分析了1996年至2021年间八种顶级期刊 (Journal of Marketing、Journal of Consumer Research、Journal of Marketing Research、Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science、Marketing Science、Journal of Retailing、Journal of Consumer Psychology 和 International Journal of Research in Marketing）的出版物, 这些文章可在Scopus数据库中找到。

研究结果表明, 北美在市场营销学科中的霸权地位仍然存在, 并且市场营销对其他学科的影响仍然存在争议。同时, 研究发现一些大学具有根深蒂固的市场营销系传统, 且一些26年前的文章仍然经常被引用。

本研究首次尝试通过考虑八种顶级期刊来理解营销学科的学术贡献。

本研究涵盖了1996年至2021年的时间段。它仅包括文章, 使用了单一数据库, 并且是横断面研究。未来的研究应该通过使用各种数据库进行全面分析, 探索更长时间段。

Brent B. Allred is an Associate Professor of Strategic Management and International Business at The College of William & Mary, in Williamsburg, VA. He earned his Ph.D. in Strategic Management/International Business at The Pennsylvania State University. His current research interests are in technology sourcing and patent rights. He has published in various journals, including the Journal of International Business Studies, Management International Review, the Journal of International Management, Academy of Management Executive, and the Journal of Product Innovation Management.

This study synthesises the self-determination theory (SDT), expectation-confirmation model (ECM), and protection motivation theory (PMT) to formulate an integrated theoretical framework that elucidates the process of shaping the intention to continue using facial recognition payment (FRP) under the conditional impact of perceived technology security.

Data from 667 Beijing Winter Olympics visitors with FRP experience were collected through an online survey and analysed using variance based-structural equation modelling (VB-SEM).

This study reveals that the intention to continue using FRP evolves through three key stages. Initially, in the expectation stage, the multidimensional concept of artificial autonomy (sensing, thought, and action), which is underpinned by self-determination, is pivotal, strongly influencing perceptions of service enhancement and fostering trust in FRP. Subsequently, the confirmation stage underscores the importance of perceived service enhancement and trust as vital drivers in maintaining FRP usage, while also contributing to subjective well-being. Crucially, perceived technology security emerges as a key moderating factor, enhancing positive perceptions and intentions towards FRP, thus influencing its sustained adoption.

This study stands out by revealing the nuanced interplay between artificial autonomy and user perceptions, particularly concerning service enhancement, technology security, and trust, as they influence well-being and the continued adoption of FRP. Robustly grounded in the integrated theoretical framework of SDT, ECM, and PMT, the study’s findings are critical for comprehending the core elements and specific drivers that promote sustained FRP use, especially as we consider its potential widespread implementation. Therefore, this study not only advances theoretical understanding but also offers practical guidance for optimising FRP deployment strategies in a rapidly evolving technological landscape.