Search results

Since Greece became a member of the EU and after the implementation of plethora of structural funds programs regarding the agricultural sector, the situation has remained more or less the same as far as the structural characteristics of the agricultural sector is concerned.

The agricultural sector in Greece accounts for €6.67 billion and contributes 4.3% to the total GVA which is double compared with the average European one (1.6%). The Agricultural Factor income per annual work unit (AWU) has reached 94% of the EU average. During the economic crisis (2009–2013) the value of this index decreased 22% while in the next years an upward trend followed and in 2019 reached the same level as before the economic crisis. During the period 2005–2018, productivity in Greece showed moderate and negative TFP growth numbers while in the same period, the TFP growth was stronger in the EU presenting an increase of 10%. The trade balance of agri-food products in Greece is negative, although recently this trade deficit has been reduced following an improvement in the agri-food sector's export performance. The value of agri-food products exports amount to €6.04 billion, which are the third largest category of exported goods. Also, the value of exports of manufactured products rose 70% during the period 2009–2019 against the exports of commodities, which also rose with a lower rate (25%), something that it is positive for the Greek economy, given the higher added value of manufactured products. Under the current Common Agricultural Policy Action Plan (2014–2020), Greece has a guaranteed flow of around €20 billion for direct support of agricultural income through direct payments (Pillar I) and has earmarked €15 billion and the remaining €5 billion under the Rural Development Program, (Pillar II). However, the direct payments are not allocated fairly.

The COVID-19 pandemic crisis hit the entire Greek economy and the agri-food sector which has just recovered from the recent economic crisis. However, during this crisis, the Greek agro-food chain has demonstrated great resilience to guarantee the supply of food to consumers. In the era of COVID-19, the key factors that can be employed by agri-food industry as a strategy for penetrating in global markets, are (1) Focus on developed markets, (2) Marketing in branded form (not bulk), and ideally emphasis on the uniqueness of the raw material, and (3) Sufficient volume of products to gain a leading share in the premium segment of the market. In addition, knowledge and innovation have a key role to play in helping farmers and rural communities meet future challenges. Finally, the only way in order to achieve economies of scale in the agri-food sector is to increase the level of cooperation at all levels by any available means.

The tourism industry in Greece has come a long way since its beginning as a distinct economic activity to reach the recent impressive results. It is a sector that has grown remarkably and became a major source of growth for the Greek economy. As such this chapter aims to discuss the importance and the potential of the sector, the unique characteristics of the Greek tourism industry and the future challenges ahead. Tables and suitable graphics are provided to visually enhance and inform the discussion. A wide range of articles, journals, books, and electronic sources has been reviewed to present as accurately and up to date information as possible. This chapter can therefore prove useful for academics and non-academics to use it as a reference point for the tourism sector in Greece.

Although the trigger for the European economic and financial crisis was the subprime and subsequently banking crisis in the USA, the true roots of theEuropean malaise are to be found in the structural weaknesses of the European growth and Euro area development model based on debt financing of public and private expenditure and investment. These drivers were amplified by the lack of effective economic policy mechanisms from both the monetary and fiscal sides of macro-economic management. The global financial crisis of 2007–2009 did not cause the underlying imbalances that are currently acting to tear apart the Euro area monetary and fiscal systems. Instead, it crystallised markets and public attention on the underlying core cause of the overall Euro crisis – the insolvency of the public financing system of the European Union (EU) member states.

Purpose: The present study investigates how the performance of Greek bank branching varies when the external environment causes dramatic changes that are reflected in recession and capital control effects.

Design/Methodology: A unique dataset of accounting Profit and Loss statements of retail branches of a systemic Greek commercial bank, closely supervised by the European Central Bank (ECB), is utilized. A profit bootstrap Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model is selected to measure the bank branch efficiency. The derived efficiency estimates are analyzed through a second-stage panel data regression analysis against a set of efficiency drivers related to branch profitability, diversification of income, branch size, and branch activity.

Findings: The results indicate that recession negatively affects branch efficiency in the short and long run. The occurrence of recession significantly intensifies the efficiency premium of branch profitability, reduces the efficiency premium of diversification of income (i.e., a negative efficiency effect is recorded during the early recession period), while mitigating the generally negative efficiency effect of branch size. The analysis of efficiency effects from the deep recession period that encompasses capital controls reveals the importance of diversification of income for the improvement of profit efficiency at bank branch level.

Originality/Value: This is the first branch banking study that explores branch efficiency alteration and the dynamic of branch efficiency drivers when the economy suddenly enters recession and afterwards when conditions are becoming extremely difficult and consequently capital controls are imposed on the economy.

The main purpose of this chapter is to shed more light into the challenging small business (SME) task of securing adequate and appropriate funding for continued viability. Access to finance is of fundamental importance to SME survival, invariably it involves working capital needs or long-term capital projects. This chapter will mainly focus on the Greek environment and the individual characteristics of the domestic market, in particular. As in most countries, SMEs form the backbone of Greece’s economic activity, accounting for almost 95% of the total. They are the very backbone of the country’s daily business and labour force. Crucially, the Greek banking system upon which many small enterprises rely has collapsed during the years of global financial crisis, with the domestic banks literally ending up completely drained of all available liquidity.

In a country that has gone through enormous financial turmoil, and with a damaged banking system that has undergone three recapitalisation processes, domestic companies had little, if any, support from the traditional banking sources. In the summer of 2015, things became critical, when the country almost left the European Union’s (EU) common currency zone and entered a capital control regime. As a result, enterprises sought other channels of financing to overcome the obstacle. Focus in this chapter will be on the role of the stock market, the national investment funds and the EU funding.

This chapter, in the main, builds insight from a research-informed case study: that of Greek SMEs and their access to finance (excluding the banking sector). The time span of the analysis covers the years of the domestic financial crisis, lasting considerably more than within the other European countries. Though varying in magnitude, the crisis in Greece started sometime in 2010 and concluded in 2018, leaving deep scars on the country’s productive body. During that period, the domestic banking system underwent catalytic changes, embracing three major recapitalisation schemes and an enormous merger phase that ended up with only four remaining systemic banks. Prior to that, the 2012 Private Sector Involvement (bailout program) led the country’s rating to a default status and made financing options extremely difficult.

This chapter will also offer comparisons to other European states, to enable drawing of conclusions about the different operating parameters of doing business in the greater region; and to facilitate search for common patterns between the countries that were hit by the credit crunch and also saw their banking systems weaken. The data will be drawn exclusively from secondary sources, including national and European public and private organisations dealing with financial and investment analyses. Once gathered, data is categorised and critically evaluated to look deeper into the nature of the behaviour of SMEs and the financing channels they have found during the study sample period.

Key findings will include the reporting and the evaluation of Greek firms’ access to finance with regard to non-banking sources, such as the stock market, EU funding, investment laws and venture funds. Comparison with prior years and with other European markets will show the main challenges and obstacles firms faced, and the solutions they found during the crisis.

Limitations can be split into two categories: first, the data reported at public and private sites include by default the official sector of the economy, thus, omitting the reporting of parallel or unofficial market activity. In an economy that includes approximately 20% of unofficial GDP, such sources most probably proved catalytic in the companies’ liquidity, without being officially reported. Second, the time span of the sample is quite large, making it difficult to analyse the specific characteristics of various companies at various time points in full detail. However, the chapter’s main purpose is to offer an all-inclusive picture of how things evolved during the years of the crisis and not to focus on specific points. Describing the big picture is the priority of this chapter, with a focus on capturing the financing trends during this period of abnormality. Perhaps a further study in the future could be inspired by this current one, to break-up the period into smaller pieces and dedicate detailed analysis to each chunk. Useful conclusions will be drawn in this chapter for policy-makers, including both fiscal and monetary directors, who will get a clearer picture of how the credit crunch influenced the market, and how SMEs worked their way through these challenging times to find ways to finance their operations, development and growth. The major contribution of this chapter is it being the first to cover SMEs exclusively during all years of the financial crisis in a country like Greece that has seen its banking sector collapse. Firms were left without their traditional source of funding, the next-door bank, and managed to find alternative routes to finance to survive and keep on going.

Greece's slow recovery from the severe economic depression caused by the great global financial and economic crisis that erupted in late 2000s was interrupted by the effects of COVID-19 pandemic on economic activity. This chapter looks into the factors shaping Greece's competitive position and discusses the potential to achieve a V-shaped recovery at the end of the pandemic.

This paper documents the EU integration process using the uneven and combined development framework. Because capitalist social relations are territorially defined and politically built, unevenness between countries is not unconnected with that within countries and both involve antagonism between capital and labor. This is manifest in the ‘state form’ of the EU and its anti-democratic tendencies: public institutions at the community level play a major role in reinforcing unevenness in favour of leading countries, in both the productive and financial spheres.

This chapter explores the impact of the seemingly new recognition of non-Muslims in Turkey, a historically marginalized minority. In the 2000s, the ruling AKP party, a religiously and socially conservative party, made a number of symbolic gestures toward the increasing recognition of these communities. This chapter explores this ethnographically and historically by looking at the political effects of AKP’s democratization attempts on the Rum Orthodox (“Greek”) community in Istanbul. It argues that these attempts paralleled a similar language of democracy within the community particularly in the aftermath of the government’s permission to run elections in the non-Muslim community institutions (vakıfs), following a period of time during which no elections had been held in these institutions. At the same time, these attempts occasioned old and new forms of hierarchies within the community, which emerged as a result of the competing claims within it to its representation. These seemingly ambiguous effects of democratization within the Rum community emerged in the gap between the AKP’s democracy discourse that claims universal inclusion and its highly selective practice of democracy. This was so because the AKP preserved the ethnoreligious definition of national identity even while it readopted the historical legacies of the Ottoman millet system that managed society along religious confessional lines. These findings contribute to the existing theories on democratization by highlighting the inextricable link between inclusion and exclusion that emerges in the gap between the discursive claims of democracy toward universal inclusion and the selective actualization of these claims in practice. Such selective inclusion that is inherent to the politics of democracy is managed differently in different contexts due to the hybrid forms of state recognition of the population.