Search results

In continuation to Chapter 3, the present chapter tries to quantify the impact of credit upon GDP and HDI as the first attempt and the linkages of NPA and security investments with credit, GDP and HDI of the countries as the second attempt. For these purposes, this chapter starts with the measurements of credit elasticity with respect to GDP and HDI to know the impact of credit on the private sectors upon the income and human development of the countries. Then, it focuses on the implications of common banking operating tools such as their investments in the governments’ securities in relation to credit to the private sectors, GDP and HDI of the selected countries in a panel data format. The results of the credit elasticity of GDP show that it has taken the positive sign in all of the countries and the negative changes are very little in number. Furthermore, the results on the linkages show that all the variables are mostly cointegrated and therefore maintain stable and equilibrium relationships in the long run among them. But the short-run results show that investment and credit make a cause to NPA, and investment and NPA make a cause to GDP. No variables make any interrelationships with the HDI in either the long-run or short-run systems. Thus, the countries in the list should put more emphasis on the working of the financial sectors as the key partner in the income-generating activities.

In this study, the authors propose a VaR method for evaluating the market risk of investing in the stock portfolio of Pension Institutions. The data used for this research is hypothetical data, including the exposure or the amount of value invested by Pension Institutions in their stock portfolio. With the VaR – Monte Carlo simulation, the authors know the loss level will occur when the Indonesian economy or market conditions deteriorate. The lost value amount is determined in the Rupiah value, according to the confidence level or the desired percentile level. The results revealed that at the 5% (99.95%) percentile level of confidence, a pension fund with an investment value of IDR 4,070,000,000 would suffer a loss of IDR 1,110,000,000. While at the 1% (99.995%), the loss rate will be of IDR 1,480,000,000. The conclusion is that the results of this study are useful for Pension Institutions in managing their asset portfolios with the VaR model.

The author develops a bilateral Nash bargaining model under value uncertainty and private/asymmetric information, combining ideas from axiomatic and strategic bargaining theory. The solution to the model leads organically to a two-tier stochastic frontier (2TSF) setup with intra-error dependence. The author presents two different statistical specifications to estimate the model, one that accounts for regressor endogeneity using copulas, the other able to identify separately the bargaining power from the private information effects at the individual level. An empirical application using a matched employer–employee data set (MEEDS) from Zambia and a second using another one from Ghana showcase the applied potential of the approach.

This chapter focuses on organizational preservation and curation capabilities. The authors define capabilities and explain how they pertain to an enterprise architecture. The authors describe preservation as it is currently practiced in relation to information and data. They also explain how preservation should be expanded to cover knowledge assets. Knowledge preservation exists today as a support capability, aligned with information and data management. Curation is described as an emerging but fragmented practice. It is modeled as a new business capability.

The performance of thermal comfort utilising machine learning and its acceptability by students and other users at the Professor Sir Edouard Lim Fat Engineering Tower at the University of Mauritius are evaluated in this study. Students and building occupants were asked to fill out surveys on-site as data was gathered from sensors throughout the structure. The Thermal Sensation Vote (TSV) and other important data were collected through the surveys, including the effect of wind on thermal comfort. An adaptive model incorporating solar and wind effects was evaluated using multiple linear regression techniques and RStudio. Three models were used to evaluate thermal comfort, including the adaptive one. Numerous models were compared and evaluated in order to select the best one. It was found that the adaptive model (Model 1) was deemed to be the best model for its application. It was also found that Fanger's PMV/PPD (Model 2) was a very good approach to determining thermal comfort. Through thorough analysis, it was concluded that the range of air temperature and wind speed for thermal comfort was 25.830°C–28.0°C and 0.26 m/s to 0.42 m/s, respectively. In order for cities to remain secure, resilient and sustainable, it will be important to manage thermal comfort and reduce populations' exposure to heat stress (SDG 11). The achievement of income and productivity goals will be hampered if measures to protect populations from heat stress are not taken (SDG 8). Thermal regulation is also necessary for the provision of numerous health services (SDG 3).

The European Union’s Digital Markets Act (DMA) calls for far-reaching changes to the way economic activity will occur in EU digital markets. Before its remedies are imposed, it is critical to assess their impacts on individual markets, the digital sector, and the overall European economy. The European Commission (EC) released an Impact Assessment in support of the DMA that purports to evaluate it using cost/benefit analysis.

An economic evaluation of the DMA should consider its full impacts on dynamic competition. The Impact Assessment neither assesses the DMA's impact on dynamic competition in the digital economy nor evaluates the impacts of specific DMA prohibitions and obligations. Instead, it considers benefits in general and largely ignores costs. We study its benefit assessments and find they are based on highly inappropriate methodologies and assumptions. A cost/benefit study using inappropriate methodologies and largely ignoring costs cannot provide a sound policy assessment.

Instead of promoting dynamic competition between platforms, the DMA will likely reinforce existing market structures, ossify market boundaries, and stunt European innovation. The DMA is likely to chill R&D by encouraging free riding on the investments of others, which discourages making those investments. Avoiding harm to innovation is critical because innovation delivers large, positive spillover benefits, driving increases in productivity, employment, wages, and prosperity.

The DMA prioritizes static over dynamic competition, with the potential to harm the European economy. Given this, the Impact Assessment does not demonstrate that the DMA will be beneficial overall, and its implementation must be carefully tailored to alleviate or lessen its potential to harm Europe’s economic performance.