Search results

In the KOSPI2oo futures and option markets. additional fifteen minutes (15 : 00∼15 개5) after the underlying stock market close are given tor the adjustments of the futures and option positions. During the first five minutes. 15: 00∼15 : 05. a continuous auction trading is made. while the trading at a single clearing price is made for the remaining ten minutes. 15: 05∼15: 15.

Previous studies focused on the synchronous trading in terms of transaction time in the analysis of the lead-lag relationship. truncating the futures and option data during 15 : 00∼15 : 15. In this article. we explore how the KOSPI2oo futures and option returns for the extra fifteen minutes impact the next day's KOSPI200 cash returns, We also examine the lead-lag relationship during the reggular trading hours (9 : 00∼15 : 00) and the impact of the cash returns during 14 : 20∼15 : 00 on futures and option returns during 15 : 00∼15: 15. Our main findings are summarized as follows.

First. the KOSPI200 futures and option returns during 15 : 00∼15 : 15 lead the close-to-open KOSPI200 cash return, even though the trading volume and return volatility during 15: 00∼15: 15 are lower relative to the regular stock market session (9 : 00∼15: 00). The impact of the futures and option returns on the cash return lasts hlK) minutes and one minute‘ repectively. after the next day open. Second. the option return during the continuous auction trading session (15 : 00∼ 15 : 05) leads the close-to-open cash return. while the futures return of trading at a single clearing price during 15 : 05∼15 : 10 impacts the close-to-open cash return. Third, we found that the lead-lag relationships among the KOSPI200 futures, option, and cash returns are not constant during the reg비ar stock market session‘ In partieular. the impact of the KOSPI200 cash ret un during 14 : 40∼15 : 00 on the futures and option retuns for the 15 : 00∼15: 15 Interval is much stronger. compared with other time zones.

Finally. the KOSPI200 cash return during the last ten minutes of trading at a Single clearing price (14 : 50∼15 : 00). significantly impacts the option return during 15: 00∼15: 05. while there is no impact on the futures return (15 : 00∼15: 15).

This study examines the bid/ask spread and its components in the KOSPI200 options market under the framework of the cross-market model, which utilizes the order flow information of both KOSPI200 futures and options markets. We also compare the results by the single-market model (MRR model; Madhavan et al., 1997) and by the cross-market model (Ryu (2011)’s extension). This comparison suggests that the cross-market approach can mitigate the underestimation of the permanent spread component of OTM options and the overestimation of the component of ITM options, which are often detected when we directly apply the single market model into the KOSPI200 options market where the ITM options are relatively illiquid while the OTM options are extremely liquid. We also find that the effect of the order flow information of the futures market on the option spread and its permanent spread component will vary depending on the option moneyness and the intraday time period. This implies that the order flow of the futures market has more significant effects if the degree of informed trading is relatively high.

In this study, we explore the empirical relationship between trading volume and volatility among KOSPI200 index stock market, futures and options markets. In particular, in explaining the volatility of each market, the trading in other markets, as well as the trading volume of other markets, also served as explanatory variables. In other words, cross-market effects of trading volume by investor types are analyzed. The empirical results show that there exist the cross-market effects of the relationship between trading volume and volatility in deeply integrated financial markets such as KOSPI200 index stock, futures and options markets. That is, the volatility of one market is explained by the trading volume of trader types in other financial markets. And, overall options trading increases the volatility of each market, while the overall futures trading volume of foreign investors reduce the volatility of each market. Trading volume of Individual investors does not reduce the volatilities of KOSPI200 index and futures markets. That is, trading volume of Individual investors in stock, futures, and options markets increase the volatilities of stock and futures. This implies that foreign investors are informed traders, whereas individual investors are liquidity traders.

This paper aims to provide the necessity to activate long-term exchange-traded derivatives (ETD) in Korea. In the era of aging, low interest rates and low economic growth, the investment demand for long-term financial products, and its hedging demand have steadily increased. Unfortunately, long-term ETD do not trade in Korea, and this study presents political suggestions to invigorate long-term ETD based on overseas cases and empirical analysis. Specifically, this study suggests the necessity to activate exchange traded funds (ETFs) options, long-term Korea treasury bond futures and options and long-term Volatility Index of Korea Composite Stock Price Index future and options. The introduction of those long-term ETD not only contributes to providing long-term investment and hedging vehicles but also reduces market inefficiencies in the Korean industry of ETFs, bonds and structured products.

The National Pension Service (NPS) of Korea is one of the largest institutional investors in the world and it has been known as the market stabilizer in the Korean stock market. Nevertheless, it is hard to find the research about the impact of the NPS on the futures market. We investigated the effect of the NPS’s trading KOSPI200 futures on the returns, the liquidity and the volatility of the market using the recent ten years’ transaction data. The main findings are as follows. First, the NPS’s net investment flow (NIF) in the KOSPI200 futures market shows the predictability about the returns of both KOSPI200 futures and KOSPI200 spot index. Second, the NPS’s NIF in the KOSPI200 futures market improves the liquidity of the KOSPI market, where the transactions involved in both the spot market and the futures market occur. Third, the NPS’s NIF in the KOSPI200 futures market reduces the volatility of both the KOSPI200 futures market and the KOSPI market. Unlike the prior studies showing that our futures market tends to increase the volatility of the stock market through the volatility transfer, our finding suggests that the NPS’s trading KOSPI200 futures contributes to decreasing the volatility in both markets. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper is the first study that investigates the impact of the NPS’s trading KOSPI200 futures on the KOSPI200 futures market and the stock market. It shows that the NPS plays a role of the market stabilizer in the futures market. In addition, the NPS’s trading KOSPI200 futures also affects the KOSPI stock market, stabilizing it in terms of both the liquidity and the volatility.

It is known that the National Pension Service (NPS) of Korea contributes to the market stability because it tends to pursue the negative feedback trading strategy in the Korean stock market. While many studies deal with institutional investors’ trading in the financial derivatives market, the NPS’s trading in the derivatives market is rarely studied. Using the NPS’s trading data for the period from January 2010 to March, 2020, the authors examine the transactions of the NPS in the KOSPI200 futures market. We find that the NPS’s net investment flow (NIF) in KOSPI200 futures is negatively associated with the past returns of KOSPI200 futures and the KOPI200 index. However, we also find that the NPS’s NIF of KOSPI200 futures is positively associated with its NIF in KOSPI200 stocks. Along with the legal restriction on the NPS’s trading in the derivatives market, the result suggests that the NPS uses KOSPI200 futures to deviate the problems related to non-synchronous trading in the spot market. To the best of our knowledge, this paper is the first study of the NPS’s transactions of KOSPI200 futures. The paper suggests that the NPS does not trade KOSPI200 futures for hedging or arbitrage profit but for complementing its transactions in the spot market of KOSPI200 stocks.

This study analyzes whether KOSPI200 option returns can be predicted by call-put implied volatility spreads. Doran et al. (2013) show that call-put implied volatility spreads predict the option returns of a specific moneyness as well as underlying asset returns in the US options market. Our study examines whether the same results are shown in the KOSPI200 options market, which has different characteristics in investor compositions and trading behaviors. According to the results, the call-put implied volatility spreads cannot predict the future returns of the underlying index significantly in the KOSPI200 options market. Only, the call-put spreads can predict the future option returns. More specifically, the increase in implied volatility spreads is able to predict the decrease in call option returns and the increase in put option returns in the KOSPI200 options market. This supports the overreaction hypothesis in all ranges of option moneyness, which is in contrast to the result of Doran et al. (2003).

The purpose of this paper is to examine whether the superiority of the implied volatility from a stochastic volatility model over the implied volatility from the Black and Scholes model on the forecasting performance of future realized volatility still holds when intraday data are analyzed.

Two implied volatilities and a realized volatility on KOSPI200 index options are estimated every hour. The grander causality tests between an implied volatility and a realized volatility is carried out for checking the forecasting performance. A dummy variable is added to the grander causality test to examine the change of the forecasting performance when a specific environment is chosen. A trading simulation is conducted to check the economic value of the forecasting performance.

Contrary to the previous studies, the implied volatility from a stochastic volatility model is not superior to that from the Black and Scholes model for the intraday volatility forecasting even if both implied volatilities are informative on one hour ahead future volatility. The forecasting performances of both implied volatilities are improved under high volatile market or low return market.

The trading strategy using the forecasting power of an implied volatility earns positively, in particular, more positively under high volatile market or low return market. However, it looks risky to follow the trading strategy because the performance is too volatile. Between two implied volatilities, it is hardly to say that one implied volatility beats another in terms of the economic value.

This is the first study which shows the forecasting performances of implied volatilities on the intraday future volatility.

This study estimates the VPIN (volume-synchronized probability of informed trading) of the KOSPI200 index options, the measure of order flow toxicity suggested by Easley et al. (2012), for the first time. To apply the VPIN approach, options are categorized by their real-time moneyness. I examine the predictive power of VPIN for the future stock market volatility using time-series regression analysis. The empirical result shows that the toxic order flow measure estimated by price changes has more information than that estimated by the actual order imbalance. In general, put options contain more information than call options, and the toxic order flow measure of OTM (out-of-the-money) put options contains the most significant information about the future stock market volatility. In addition, the predictive power of toxic order flow measure is much significant in the highly volatile than in the stable market. The volatility predictability of toxic order flow measure declined significantly after the option multiplier increase, whereas it has gradually recovered over time.

The purpose of this study is to investigate hedging effectiveness of KOSPI200 index futures and options using three measures proposed by Fishburn (1977), Ederington (1979), and Howard and D’Antonio (1987). The comparison of hedging effectiveness is conducted based on the market prices of KOSPI200 index futures and options traded in Korea Exchange (KRX) between January of 2001 and January of 2011, during which bootstrapping method is utilized to make a dataset of 100,000 random samples with holding period of 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. We examine the hedging performance of hedge portfolios made of short futures, protective puts and covered calls respectively based on three hedging effectiveness measures.

One of our finding is that short futures hedging is better than options in minimizing total volatility risk as well as down-side risk, which is consistent to the previous researches. Also futures hedging is more effective in reducing the VaR than the others. Secondly, the optimal hedge ratios of futures in minimizing total risk and down-side risk are turned out to be 0.97~0.98 and 0.94~0.95 respectively. Third, OTM short call hedge is the best hedging instrument when hedgers would like to maximize the Sharpe ratio. Finally, protective put hedging strategy is in general inferior to the short futures and covered call hedge based on three hedging effectiveness measures.