Search results
1 – 10 of 644John U. Farley and Donald R. Lehmann
Considers the current thrust in marketing to create global products, brands and strategies but also to “act local” when appropriate. Deciding which elements have similar effects…
Abstract
Considers the current thrust in marketing to create global products, brands and strategies but also to “act local” when appropriate. Deciding which elements have similar effects and which are significantly different conceptually requires meta‐analysis of each of the elements. Reviews some applications of marketing meta‐analysis with a focus on international research. The potential international impact of meta‐analysis in view of current trends in information technology and the globalization of marketing is promising, especially when the focus is on variables such as culture, geography, and economic condition rather than country per se.
Details
Keywords
Jack A. Lesser and Lakshmi K. Thumuluri
Examines the extent to which a variety of widely utilized consumer behavior concepts are systematically related. States that within marketing, consumer behaviour research appears…
Abstract
Examines the extent to which a variety of widely utilized consumer behavior concepts are systematically related. States that within marketing, consumer behaviour research appears to lack structure and direction.Attempts to determine the nature of the interrelationships which exist between different widely examined classical consumer concepts and provides some discussion regarding the findings including areas for further comparison.
Details
Keywords
Noel Capon, John U. Farley, James M. Hulbert and David Lei
The Peters and Waterman framework of eight management principles,focused largely on organisational design issues, is used to examinedifferences between 19 “excellent” and…
Abstract
The Peters and Waterman framework of eight management principles, focused largely on organisational design issues, is used to examine differences between 19 “excellent” and 50 “non‐excellent” firms. Data from large United States manufacturers show that the “excellent” companies earn higher returns on capital, have less variable returns and are more innovative. They also tend to operate businesses which emphasise high value‐adding activities further downstream, closer to the final market. Twenty‐two measured items associated with the eight Peters and Waterman principles differ systematically between the “excellent” and “non‐excellent” firms. In addition, 13 measures associated more directly with strategy also differ systematically. High investment in R&D, a strong international posture, and strong market positions provide an alternative explanation to the Peters and Waterman principles for good profit and innovation performance by the “excellent” firms, thus reinforcing the need to better understand industry and global strategy dynamics – as well as the ingredients of entrepreneurial, open climates.
Details
Keywords
This article proposes a conceptual framework and a research methodology for transferring marketing technology to developing countries to address important societal problems. The…
Abstract
This article proposes a conceptual framework and a research methodology for transferring marketing technology to developing countries to address important societal problems. The methodology developed by the author is described and illustrated with an empirical investigation. Guidelines for implementation of this methodology in developing countries are also provided.
L.L. Leachman, Christie H. Paksoy and J.B. Wilkinson
This research applies vector autoregression to estimate a system composed of market share and relative advertising expenditures of the seven major competitors in the U. S…
Abstract
This research applies vector autoregression to estimate a system composed of market share and relative advertising expenditures of the seven major competitors in the U. S. replacement passenger tire market between 1972 and 1983. The results of the study suggest that a company's market share in this market cannot be predicted from its relative advertising expenditures.