Search results

The US fossil fuel industry is vulnerable to opposition from other sectors of the ruling class. Non-fossil fuel capitalists might conclude that climate breakdown jeopardizes their interests. State actors such as judges, regulators, and politicians may come to the same conclusion. However, these other elite actors are unlikely to take concerted collective action against fossil fuels in the absence of growing disruption by grassroots activists. Drawing from the history of the Obama, Trump, and Biden presidencies, I analyze the forces determining government climate policies and private-sector investments. I focus on how the climate and Indigenous movements have begun to force changes in the behavior of certain ruling-class interests. Of particular importance is these movements' progress in two areas: eroding the financial sector's willingness to fund and insure fossil fuels, and influencing judges and regulators to take actions that further undermine investors' confidence in fossil fuels. Our future hinges largely on whether the movements can build on these victories while expanding their base within labor unions and other strategically positioned sectors.

Energy policy and sector developments in Greece in the last decades reveal the government and investors' intentions to exploit the energy resources and production potential of the country. Developments regard renewable and hydrocarbon energy sources. Agreements with international companies come with economic terms attached and the prospect of related sectors' development, employment generation, research and innovation. Developments, particularly those related to hydrocarbons exploration, take place in times of climate change mitigation and adaptation and actions to ensure environmentally, socially, and economically sustainable development in line with the goals set out in the United Nations Agenda for 2030 and the European Green Deal. Given these challenges, the design and implementation of timely policies that can promote local supply capacity appear to be of primary importance. This chapter discusses the challenges and opportunities of designing and implementing local content policies with the intention to derive useful policy considerations. The discussion draws from the latest developments with hydrocarbons exploration and production activities in Greece and from the recent relevant to local content literature. The analysis concludes that in the face of climate action, rapid technological innovation, and the high capital intensity that characterize the sector, knowledge transfer, and education upgrade emerge as important factors of achieving sustainable growth through local content policies.

The Equator Principles are a transnational corporate social responsibility initiative in the project finance sector. In 2013, the Equator Principles Association celebrated the tenth anniversary of its principles and at the same time the formal launch of the latest generation of the Equator Principles (EP III). The paper describes the historic development of the Equator Principles – from the initial drafting process in the early 2000s up to the latest review process which led to the third generation of the Equator Principles. The paper also analyzes the current state of affairs of the Equator Principles (Association) and gives a brief outlook on potential lines of (future) development. In particular, the paper deals with the following questions: What are the main characteristics of the Equator Principles framework? What are the relevant actors involved in the drafting and reviewing process? Why are the EPs and other organizational and associational codes of conduct in the finance sector so important? What has been achieved so far by the Equator Principles (Association) and the participating (financial) institutions and what remains to be done?

Purpose – To describe the social process of building of an inter-organizational network and analyse the control practices implemented by its members.

Methodology/approach – The paper offers a holistic approach considering the institutional dynamics and management control practices in the network as a whole. This makes it possible to trace the development of practice variation, which is one of the most recent but up to now poorly studied problems in the field of institutional theory (Lounsbury, 2008). The paper draws on a case study of a newly established network of supply companies related to a petroleum project in North-West Russia.

Findings – Organizational arrangements in the network as well as corresponding controls are constructed as a result of interplay between several institutional logics such as Western network experience, international rules related to petroleum projects, the Soviet industrial background of the members, and their local community values. The controls demarcate organizationally members’ behaviour, and thereby define the conditions for practice variations. On the other hand, use of such controls over time leads to unintended consequences and control dilemmas. Facing these dilemmas, the network members address them differently, and therefore more practice variations are being created continually.

Originality/value of paper – The paper gives insight into an emerging business network, a setting normally neglected in the inter-organizational control literature, and establishes a dyadic view of management control, arguing that it both defines and creates conditions for practice variation.

Practical implications – Local supply chains play an important role in global petroleum projects. Decision-makers involved in petroleum projects will benefit from better understanding the cooperation processes prevalent in local industries.

The chapter provides an economic explanation and perspectivation of strategic asset seeking of multinational enterprises from emerging economies (EMNEs) as a prominent feature of today’s global economy.

The authors apply and extend the “springboard perspective.” This perspective submits that EMNEs acquire strategic assets in developed markets primarily for use in their home markets.

The authors succumb that the springboard perspective is alluring theoretically as well as empirically as it suggests that when EMNEs acquire strategic assets, they experience liabilities of foreignness (LOF) that are low relative to those of MNEs from developed markets. The authors concede to this LOF asymmetry but also point out that liabilities of outsidership (LOO) can offset or weaken the home-market advantage of some EMNEs when competing with MNEs.

LOO appears as the more relevant concept to use when explaining strategic asset seeking of EMNEs. A set of propositions are formulated to guide empirical testing.

The insights gained from using the springboard perspective and the LOO concept are non-trivial: They basically predict future dominance of ‘insider’ EMNEs at the expense of MNEs from developed markets.

Liability of foreignness (LOF) is a well-known concept in international business domain. At the core of LOF is the insight that firms face social and economic costs when they operate in foreign markets. Extant literature acknowledges that the ability of firms to overcome LOF in host locations varies; however, it does not discuss the possibility that the LOF itself could vary for different firms at the same location. We extend this literature by examining how a firm's interaction with the host and the home country environments affect the LOF that it faces in foreign markets.

We argue that there are two sources of LOF – environmentally derived LOF and firm-based LOF. The environmentally derived LOF has its source in home and host country environments. Firm-based LOF, on the contrary, derives from firm-specific characteristics including ownership structure, firm-specific resources, learning and network-based linkages such as affiliation to a business group. Furthermore, we argue that both the environmentally derived and the firm-based LOF are different for emerging market (EM) firms as compared to developed market (DM) firms. We develop testable propositions about how environment-specific and firm-specific factors affect LOF and suggest directions for future research.

The aim of this chapter is to propose a critical analysis of socially responsible investing (SRI) through debate and reconstruction. Our goal is therefore to try to understand how the definition of ethics in finance has steered SRI towards a financial approach where ethics is guided by finance.

This chapter proposes a two-point approach consisting of a meta-debate and development perspectives. Each approach is divided into three debates (ideological and philosophical, scientific and practical), which are interconnected.

The chapter concludes that the debate on mainstream SRI is necessary but should be re-discussed, as it is preventing in its current form the concept from developing and being grounded in real ethical values, sacrificing the individual ethics that should be driving investing decisions.

The chapter proposes to rethink the paradigm around SRI through a conceptual framework that re-inserts finance within ethics, where non-financial performance and impact investment should be at the centre of the scientific debates, leading to an SRI based on exclusion, the consideration of controversies and social impact measurement.