Index

Teacher-led Inquiry in School Learning Environments

ISBN: 978-1-83797-217-3, eISBN: 978-1-83797-216-6

Publication date: 27 September 2024

This content is currently only available as a PDF

Citation

(2024), "Index", Mahat, M. and Bradbeer, C. (Ed.) Teacher-led Inquiry in School Learning Environments (Linking Theory and Practice in Learning Environments), Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 117-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83797-216-620241010

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2024 Marian Mahat and Chris Bradbeer. Published under exclusive licence by Emerald Publishing Limited


INDEX

Action research
, 38

brief/initial planning
, 79–80

construction/getting ready
, 80

hand-over/moving in
, 80

lessons learnt
, 84–85

POE/reflecting and adjusting
, 80–83

principal reflection on impact of
, 34

process
, 2

at Viscontini
, 79–83

Agency Self Perception Tool (ASPT)
, 70, 72

Agile learning environments
, 3–4

Assessment tools
, 61–62

Baseline data
, 33

Bathroom design group
, 20

Being an effective Stonefields teacher (BEST)
, 63, 66

model to inquire about spatial literacy and organization for learning
, 66–70

Stonefields school BEST rubric
, 65

Stonefields school professional growth cycle
, 64

Bellevue Hill Public School (BHPS)
, 26, 37–38

Bellevue Hill school community, The
, 26

Brainforest
, 28–29

Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) programme
, 32

Building capability of teachers
, 107

Building teacher capacity
, 37–38

Challenges in school
, 101–102

Change agents, teacher-led inquiry enables teachers to become
, 112

Claremont College
, 42

collaborative teaching models
, 43

Claremont models
, 46

Closed-to-learning conversation
, 51

Collaboration
, 29, 33–34, 60, 68, 70

Collaborative inquiry
, 61

Collaborative practice
, 5

Collaborative teaching

Claremont college collaborative teaching models
, 44–46

and learning spaces
, 42

models
, 42–43, 47

Collective efficacy, teacher collaboration and
, 60–61

Communication strategies
, 42–43, 47, 52

Claremont College’s top tips for courageous conversations
, 50–51

courageous conversations and professional dialogue
, 47–49

open to learning conversations
, 49–52

Community of Schools
, 39

Community of Schools in the Eastern Suburbs (CoSiES)
, 39

Composite classes
, 58

Conceptual inquiry learning
, 30, 32

Consultation process
, 79–80

Contemporary schools learning environments
, 3

Control group
, 14

Co–teaching in classroom
, 42–43

Council of Europe Development Bank (CEB)
, 76, 79

Country contexts as self-directed learners, teacher-led inquiry positions teachers
, 111–112

Courageous conversations
, 47–49

Cross-curricular conceptual framework of learning
, 29

Culture
, 37

Cultures of Thinking
, 39

Cyclical process
, 2

Design
, 4–5

groups
, 18–23

process
, 12, 27–28

Digging deeper
, 66–67

Education
, 90

landscape in Malaysia
, 91

planning principles
, 27

stakeholders
, 95–96

Education Assistance Scheme
, 93

Educational contexts as self-directed learners, teacher-led inquiry positions teachers across
, 111–112

Educational Planning Principles
, 26

Educators
, 102, 111

Edutainment
, 101

Engagement
, 7, 61–62

English as a Second Language (ESL)
, 34

European Investment Bank
, 76

European Union bank (EU bank)
, 79

Flexible and agile spaces
, 4–5

Flexible learning environments
, 3–4

Focus groups
, 15–18

sessions
, 16

Ford documents
, 108–109

Hub teams
, 61

Indigenous children
, 95–96

INDIRE
, 81

Information technology (IT)
, 14–15

Innovative assessment tools
, 72

Innovative educational and learning spaces
, 87

Innovative Learning Environment (ILE)
, 58, 87, 111–112

developing teacher and leadership capacity
, 27–28

education planning principles
, 27

2018 post-occupancy evaluation
, 36–37

principal reflection on impact of action research
, 34

school context
, 26

transition into innovative learning environments 2017–2018
, 34–36

Year 1 team action research
, 28–30

Year 1 team reflections and learning
, 30

Year 3 team action research
, 30–32

Year 3 team reflections and learning
, 32

Year 5 team action research
, 32–33

Year 5 team reflections and learning
, 33

Innovative learning spaces
, 27–28

Innovative space
, 60

Inquiry process
, 15, 61, 96

Intentional design of learning spaces
, 72–73

Iterative data collection cycle
, 16–17

Iterative process of inquiry
, 4

JAKOA
, 93

Language
, 60

Leadership

capacity
, 27–28

challenge
, 25–26

Learners
, 67–68, 70

Learning
, 37

BEST model and TLA cycle to inquire about spatial literacy and organization for
, 66–70

communities
, 12

conversations
, 49–52

different approach to
, 95–96

environments
, 35, 98, 101

implications for
, 4–6

process
, 62–63

teacher-led inquiry enables mindsets to grow as teachers use and inhabit
, 112–113

Learning and Support Teachers (LSTs)
, 34

Lencioni’s meeting principles
, 52

Literacy

efforts to enhance
, 97–98

struggle with
, 96–98

Malaysia’s Graduate Leadership Programme
, 110

Middle School Pathfinders at Singapore American School, The
, 24

Milan Polytechnic, The
, 83

Multi-modal approaches
, 69

Municipality of Milan
, 82–83

New didactic approach
, 85

New learner
, 32

New South Wales (NSW)
, 34

New Zealand Curriculum, The
, 61

Open-space school concept
, 3

Open-to-Learning (OTL) conversations
, 42–43, 49, 51

Openness to learning
, 51

Orang Aslis
, 101

beginnings
, 91–92

context
, 92–95

different approach to teaching and learning
, 95–96

education
, 94

efforts to enhance literacy
, 97–98

issue right at roots
, 92–93

low attendance and high dropout rates
, 93–94

reimagining pedagogy and learning environments
, 98–101

social emotional learning
, 94–95

struggle with literacy
, 96–98

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
, 3, 113

Organizational strategies
, 42–43

Parent and Citizens’ Association (P&C)
, 26

Partnership approach
, 79–83

Pathfinders
, 12, 14

Pedagogical approach
, 70, 101

Pedagogy
, 5, 31–32, 99

Pilot European project
, 76

Pilot initiative
, 98

Pilot Italy–Constructing Education’ project
, 87–88

Plan–Act–Observe–Review inquiry cycle
, 108–109

collaborative teaching models
, 43–47

communication strategies
, 47–52

strategic meetings
, 52–54

Positioning students concept
, 23

Post-Occupancy Evaluation (POE)
, 36–37, 80, 83–84

awards
, 37–38

culture
, 37

learning
, 37

space
, 36

teaching
, 36–37

Practitioner inquiry
, 2

Principal reflection on impact of action research
, 34

Professional dialogue
, 47–49

Professional learning. See also Learning
, 39

strategy
, 105–106

Professional learning and development (PLD)
, 66

Project Zero Classroom from Harvard University
, 38

Questionnaires
, 13–14

Rancangan Penempatan Semula/Resettlement Programme (RPS)
, 90

Reimagining learning environments
, 102

Reimagining pedagogy
, 98–101

Representative
, 93

Researchers
, 53

School and Environment-Department of Architecture and Urban Studies (DaStU)
, 83

School Learning Support Officers (SLSOs)
, 34

Schools
, 90, 113

context
, 26

context of school learning environments
, 3–4

executive team
, 52

school-wide consultative process
, 46

school-wide strategic meeting strategies
, 43

Second pilot project
, 30

Secretaries Award
, 37–38

Self–directed learners, teacher-led inquiry positions teachers across educational and country contexts as
, 111–112

Sense of belonging
, 81–82

Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM)
, 96–97

Singapore American School
, 12

SK RPS Banun
, 90, 92, 95–96, 101–102

Social emotional learning
, 94–95

Social learning theory
, 7

Space
, 36

design
, 22–23

Spatial competency
, 6–7

Spatial literacy and organization for learning, BEST model and TLA cycle to inquire about
, 66–70

Spiralling K-6 concept
, 29

Stonefields School
, 58, 60, 72

Essence Statements
, 59

inquiry at
, 61

TLA cycle
, 61–63

Strategic meetings
, 52–54

school-wide strategic meetings
, 53

Structured literacy approaches
, 69

Student voice to inform learning environment design

design groups
, 18–23

focus groups
, 15–18

illustrative narrative
, 13

pathfinder student feedback survey
, 14

student surveys
, 13–15

“Student-only” groupings
, 22

Students
, 12

Surveys
, 13–14

Teacher collaboration in learning environments

BEST
, 63–66

case study
, 66–70

digging deeper
, 66–67

focussing inquiry
, 67

inquiry at Stonefields school
, 61

measuring impact
, 69–70

notice
, 66

our school vision and philosophy
, 58–60

results from Stonefields school senior agency self perception tool
, 71–72

Stonefields school TLA cycle
, 61–63

taking action
, 67–69

teacher collaboration and collective efficacy
, 60–61

Teacher-led inquiry
, 2, 6–7

challenges and opportunities
, 6–7

context of school learning environments
, 3–4

enables mindsets to grow as teachers use and inhabit learning spaces
, 112–113

enables teachers to become agents of change
, 112

implications for teaching and learning
, 4–6

key insights and reflections
, 111–113

positions teachers across educational and country contexts as self-directed learners
, 111–112

in practice
, 105–111

Teachers
, 58–59, 63, 67–68

capacity
, 27–28

efficacy
, 112

enthusiasm
, 6

inquiry
, 43

Teaching. See also Collaborative teaching
, 36–37

different approach to
, 95–96

implications for
, 4–6

Teaching, learning and assessment (TLA) cycle
, 61–62

to inquire about spatial literacy and organization for learning
, 66–70

Team teaching
, 30

Ten Top Tips for Courageous Conversations
, 42–43, 47–48

Transition into innovative learning environments (2017–2018)
, 34–36

Trenno Park
, 78

True collaboration
, 42

University of Milan-Bicocca, The
, 81–82

Viscontini reconstruction, The
, 76

Viscontini school

action research at Viscontini
, 79–83

findings
, 84–85

implications
, 85–86

primary school
, 76, 86

school’s context
, 76–78

Whole-class teaching
, 69