Search results
1 – 10 of over 4000Emily Walton and Denise L. Anthony
Racial and ethnic minorities utilize less healthcare than their similarly situated white counterparts in the United States, resulting in speculation that these actions may stem in…
Abstract
Racial and ethnic minorities utilize less healthcare than their similarly situated white counterparts in the United States, resulting in speculation that these actions may stem in part from less desire for care. In order to adequately understand the role of care-seeking for racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare, we must fully and systematically consider the complex set of social factors that influence healthcare seeking and use.
Data for this study come from a 2005 national survey of community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries (N = 2,138). We examine racial and ethnic variation in intentions to seek care, grounding our analyses in the behavioral model of healthcare utilization. Our analysis consists of a series of nested multivariate logistic regression models that follow the sequencing of the behavioral model while including additional social factors.
We find that Latino, Black, and Native American older adults express greater preferences for seeking healthcare compared to whites. Worrying about one’s health, having skepticism toward doctors in general, and living in a small city rather than a Metropolitan Area, but not health need, socioeconomic status, or healthcare system characteristics, explain some of the racial and ethnic variation in care-seeking preferences. Overall, we show that even after comprehensively accounting for factors known to influence disparities in utilization, elderly racial and ethnic minorities express greater desire to seek care than whites.
We suggest that future research examine social factors such as unmeasured wealth differences, cultural frameworks, and role identities in healthcare interactions in order to understand differences in care-seeking and, importantly, the relationship between care-seeking and disparities in utilization.
This study represents a systematic analysis of the ways individual, social, and structural context may account for racial and ethnic differences in seeking medical care. We build on healthcare seeking literature by including more comprehensive measures of social relationships, healthcare and system-level characteristics, and exploring a wide variety of health beliefs and expectations. Further, our study investigates care seeking among multiple understudied racial and ethnic groups. We find that racial and ethnic minorities are more likely to say they would seek healthcare than whites, suggesting that guidelines promoting the elicitation and understanding of patient preferences in the context of the clinical interaction is an important step toward reducing utilization disparities. These findings also underscore the notion that health policy should go further to address the broader social factors relating to care-seeking in the first place.
Details
Keywords
This chapter provides an introduction to Volume 28, The Impact of Demographics on Health and Health Care: Race, Ethnicity and Other Social Factors. This chapter introduces the…
Abstract
This chapter provides an introduction to Volume 28, The Impact of Demographics on Health and Health Care: Race, Ethnicity and Other Social Factors. This chapter introduces the topic of demographic factors leading to differences and disparities in health and health care by reviewing more recent literature within sociology addressing social factors leading to differences in health and health. This chapter also serves as an introduction to the volume. As such, the chapter explains the organization of the volume and briefly comments on each of the chapters included in the volume.
Sara Emamgholipour Sefiddashti, Ali Kazemi Karyani and Sadegh Ghazanfari
Accessing adequate healthcare to all people is one of the main goals of the health sector. The purpose of this paper is to investigate healthcare services access development of…
Abstract
Purpose
Accessing adequate healthcare to all people is one of the main goals of the health sector. The purpose of this paper is to investigate healthcare services access development of the provinces in Iran during 2007 and 2013.
Design/methodology/approach
This is a descriptive cross-sectional study. The study population included all the provinces in Iran. The data for 13 variables, including physical and human health resources, was collected from the Ministry of Health and Medical Education and the Statistics Center of Iran. Taxonomy technique was used to determine the degree of healthcare services access development in the provinces.
Findings
The findings show that Semnan was the province with the most developed healthcare services access with development score of 0.342 while Sistan Balocehstan province was the least developed with development score of one in 2007. In the year 2013, Chahar-Mahal Bakhtiari and Sistan Baluchestan were the least and most developed provinces with scores of 0.551 and 0.989, respectively. The mean and standard deviation of the development scores in access to healthcare services in 2007 and 2013 were 0.7463±0.1268 and 0.7766±0.1058, respectively.
Originality/value
Most previous studies that examined disparities in access to healthcare resources in Iran only considered one resource. This study applied a taxonomy technique to investigate the disparity and changes in access using 13 main healthcare resources. This approach helped the authors to investigate whether the decisions of the policy makers were intended to eliminate the disparities.
Details
Keywords
Washington Patient Safety Coalition (WPSC) brings individuals and healthcare organizations together to identify and work on patient safety priorities. It holds bi-annual strategic…
Abstract
Purpose
Washington Patient Safety Coalition (WPSC) brings individuals and healthcare organizations together to identify and work on patient safety priorities. It holds bi-annual strategic planning sessions to assess program effectiveness around current organizational goals and to develop new goals. The purpose of this paper is to describe how WPSC members came to identify health disparities as a priority, and what they did to integrate this into organizational strategy.
Design/methodology/approach
For the 2015 strategic planning session, WPSC staff used 2012-2015 internal activities records to conduct a SWOT analysis. The author conducted stakeholder and member “Sensing Surveys” and framed action items on two underlying considerations: first, positioning of the members within the patient safety landscape, taking into account where the members are most “touching” the issue of disparity and are most appropriately positioned to act as change agents and, second, WPSC is not an established content expert in health disparities.
Findings
The author focused the efforts on assisting the Governor’s Interagency Council in promoting Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services standards. This Council helps to drive policy, but not necessarily operationalizing it. WPSC has ability to fulfill that role; the membership is comprised of organizational leaders, those positioned to operationalize the Council’s disparity interventions. The WPSC saw an opportunity to partner the efforts, bridging gaps between policy and operational action.
Practical implications
This viewpoint shows the power of a small collaboration interested in broadening awareness of a complex issue.
Originality/value
Health disparities are complex and multifaceted. Within the Seattle area there were many organizations committed to working on this topic, each with their unique value add to the issue.
Details
Keywords
Rosemary J. Avery, Donald Kenkel, Dean R. Lillard, Alan Mathios and Hua Wang
Health information drives crucial consumer health decisions and plays a central role in healthcare markets. Consumers who are better-informed about smoking, diet, and physical…
Abstract
Health information drives crucial consumer health decisions and plays a central role in healthcare markets. Consumers who are better-informed about smoking, diet, and physical activity make healthier choices outside the healthcare sector (Kenkel, 1991; Ippolito & Mathios, 1990, 1995; Meara, 2001). Better-informed consumers also interact differently with physicians and other healthcare providers (e.g., Cutler, Landrum, & Stewart, 2006). In addition to the immediate consequences for individual consumers, health economists have long recognized that information also has broader implications for principal–agent relationships and the functioning of healthcare markets.1 More recent lines of research in health economics and medical sociology emphasize the potential role of consumer information in explaining health disparities associated with socioeconomic status (Deaton, 2002; Goldman & Lakdawalla, 2001; Glied & Lleras-Muney, 2003; Link & Phelan, 1995). Both health economists and medical sociologists stress that because of disparities in consumer information, rapid medical progress tends to be accompanied by increased disparities in medical treatment and health outcomes.
Melissa Gomez and Linda Darnell
This chapter presents information related to models and frameworks from the perspective of cultural competence in healthcare settings, such as the Joint Commission on…
Abstract
This chapter presents information related to models and frameworks from the perspective of cultural competence in healthcare settings, such as the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, Department of Health and Human Services, specifically the Office of Minority Health and Healthy People 2020. National health-related organizations such as the American Physical Therapy Association and the American Association of Colleges of Nursing provide scaffolding for educating future health professionals regarding providing culturally competent care. Research on effectiveness of professional development and integrating cultural competence into the curriculum will be presented along with suggestions for faculty interested in incorporating these models and practices into their courses.
Details
Keywords
- Cultural competence education for healthcare providers
- competencies in cultural competence
- integrating cultural competence into healthcare program curricula
- models for cultural competence in healthcare
- faculty resources for teaching cultural competence
- integrative learning strategies for cultural competence
This chapter provides both an introduction to the volume and a review of literature on health disparities and social determinants.
Abstract
Purpose
This chapter provides both an introduction to the volume and a review of literature on health disparities and social determinants.
Methodology/approach
Literature Review.
Findings
The chapter argues for the importance of greater consideration of social determinants of health disparities. This includes a consideration of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status factors, geographic and place factors, and disparities especially linked to particular diseases.
Originality/value of paper
Reviews the topic of health disparities and social determinants and previews this book.
Details
Keywords
This chapter provides an introduction to volume 27, Research in the Sociology of Health Care, Social Sources of Disparities in Health and Health Care and Linkages to Policy…
Abstract
This chapter provides an introduction to volume 27, Research in the Sociology of Health Care, Social Sources of Disparities in Health and Health Care and Linkages to Policy, Population Concerns and Providers of Care. It introduces the topic of social sources of disparities in health and health care and discusses the approach to this issue in the United States based on federal government efforts as well as based on research by medical sociologists, political scientists, epidemiologists and researchers in health care more generally, such as those in public health. This chapter serves as an introduction to the volume also. As such, the chapter explains the organization of the volume and briefly comments on each of the chapters included in the volume.
“Disparity” implies the existence of a “markedly distinct in quality or character,” difference between one group and another. Some groups, due to elevated stigma associated with…
Abstract
“Disparity” implies the existence of a “markedly distinct in quality or character,” difference between one group and another. Some groups, due to elevated stigma associated with group membership, are invisible as a disparate minority and therefore, while there may be a great inequity in healthcare between that group and the normative population, the invisible minority is ignored. This chapter addresses the issue of healthcare for the transgender-identified population. We address how the normative viewpoint of mental illness and unacceptable religious status, along with lifelong perceived and actual abuse and violence, creates a socially sanctioned inequality in healthcare for this population.
This chapter provides both an introduction to the volume and a brief review of literature on technology, communications, and health disparities.
Abstract
Purpose
This chapter provides both an introduction to the volume and a brief review of literature on technology, communications, and health disparities.
Methodology/approach
Literature review.
Findings
The chapter argues for the importance of greater examination of technology, communications, and their linkages to health disparities and other related factors.
Originality/value of chapter
Reviews the topic of technology, communication, and health disparities and previews this book.
Details