Search results

1 – 2 of 2
Article
Publication date: 1 February 2006

S. Gary Teng, S. Michael Ho, Debra Shumar and Paul C. Liu

The aim of this research was to call attention to the implementation of failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) in a collaborative environment, the issues occurred in the…

4874

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this research was to call attention to the implementation of failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) in a collaborative environment, the issues occurred in the implementation process, and a tool that can be used by all parties in a collaborative environment for FMEA process.

Design/methodology/approach

The discussion includes the procedure of an integrated FMEA approach, how to implement the procedure in a supply chain, and the common problems occurred in its implementation in automotive industry under a collaborative environment.

Findings

The research provided an example of inconsistency in the ranking of severity, occurrence, and detection to show that the inconsistency may delay FMEA implementation in a supply chain.

Originality/value

This study offered guidelines for manufacturing industry in correcting the problems in FMEA applications, so companies can adopt their FMEA process into a collaborative supply chain environment. This paper also demonstrated a Microsoft EXCEL‐based tool that can ease the FMEA process in a collaborative environment for determining sampling size, reliability and confidence level for tests in design verification and control plan as a part of integrated FMEA process.

Details

International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 23 no. 2
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0265-671X

Keywords

Article
Publication date: 1 February 2005

S. Gary Teng, S. Michael Ho and Debra Shumar

To show that handling warranty returns is essential in a supply chain for product/process improvement and that the major step in resolving warranty return problems is to correctly…

2229

Abstract

Purpose

To show that handling warranty returns is essential in a supply chain for product/process improvement and that the major step in resolving warranty return problems is to correctly classify the returned parts and identify the problem(s).

Design/methodology/approach

Demonstrates two classification processes that separate available warranty returned parts into correct categories.

Findings

The result of these two processes provides pertinent parties in the supply chain more accurate warranty failure information, so the companies involved can precisely pin‐point the source of the failure cause in the products and improve the product's design and manufacturing. Meanwhile, it also resolves potential conflicts in a supply chain and assigns responsibility to the right party to cover incurred warranty repair cost. Its applications can enhance quality and reliability management in a supply chain and streamline the reverse logistics operations in the chain.

Originality/value

This paper offers companies an effective procedure in reducing wrongly classified warranty returns and makes root cause analysis of warranty returns more efficient.

Details

International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 22 no. 2
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0265-671X

Keywords

1 – 2 of 2