To read this content please select one of the options below:

A comparison of anomaly detection algorithms with applications on recoater streaking in an additive manufacturing process

Reinier Stribos (Fraunhofer Innovation Platform for Advanced Manufacturing, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands)
Roel Bouman (Institute for Computing and Information Sciences, Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen, The Netherlands)
Lisandro Jimenez (Department of Formal Methods and Tools, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands)
Maaike Slot (Fraunhofer Innovation Platform for Advanced Manufacturing, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands)
Marielle Stoelinga (Department of Formal Methods and Tools, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands and Institute for Computing and Information Sciences, Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen, The Netherlands)

Rapid Prototyping Journal

ISSN: 1355-2546

Article publication date: 22 August 2024

15

Abstract

Purpose

Powder bed additive manufacturing has recently seen substantial growth, yet consistently producing high-quality parts remains challenging. Recoating streaking is a common anomaly that impairs print quality. Several data-driven models for automatically detecting this anomaly have been proposed, each with varying effectiveness. However, comprehensive comparisons among them are lacking. Additionally, these models are often tailored to specific data sets. This research addresses this gap by implementing and comparing these anomaly detection models for recoating streaking in a reproducible way. This study aims to offer a clearer, more objective evaluation of their performance, strengths and weaknesses. Furthermore, this study proposes an improvement to the Line Profiles detection model to broaden its applicability, and a novel preprocessing step was introduced to enhance the models’ performances.

Design/methodology/approach

All found anomaly detection models have been implemented along with several preprocessing steps. Additionally, a new universal benchmarking data set has been constructed. Finally, all implemented models have been evaluated on this benchmarking data set and the effect of the different preprocessing steps was studied.

Findings

This comparison shows that the improved Line Profiles model established it as the most efficient detection approach in this study’s benchmark data set. Furthermore, while most state-of-the-art neural networks perform very well off the shelf, this comparison shows that specialised detection models outperform all others with the correct preprocessing.

Originality/value

This comparison gives new insights into different recoater streaking (RCS) detection models, showcasing each one with its strengths and weaknesses. Furthermore, the improved Line Profiles model delivers compelling performance in detecting RCS.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This research has been partially funded by NWO under the grant PrimaVera number NWA.1160.18.238 and by the ERC Consolidator grant CAESAR number 864075.

Citation

Stribos, R., Bouman, R., Jimenez, L., Slot, M. and Stoelinga, M. (2024), "A comparison of anomaly detection algorithms with applications on recoater streaking in an additive manufacturing process", Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-03-2024-0125

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles