To read this content please select one of the options below:

Enhancing the assessment and the feedback in higher education

Kasun Gomis (School of Engineering and Computing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK)
Mandeep Saini (Salford Business School, University of Salford, Manchester, UK)
Mohammed Arif (Department of Enterprise and External Engagement, Leeds Trinity University, Leeds, UK, and)
Chaminda Pathirage (School of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK)

Quality Assurance in Education

ISSN: 0968-4883

Article publication date: 18 December 2023

Issue publication date: 18 March 2024

109

Abstract

Purpose

Lack of appropriate student support and drawbacks in academic progression signify the importance of enhancing assessment and feedback in higher education (HE). Although assessment and feedback are significant in HE, minimal empirical research holistically explores the best practices. This study aims to address the niche and develop a decisive guideline for enhancing assessment setting and feedback provision within HE curricula.

Design/methodology/approach

A systematic approach was taken to obtain data for the study: a literature review underpinning the thematic content analysis of study documents, followed by semi-structured interviews. Document analysis contained mid-module reviews/student feedback; rubrics used in assessment; and formative/summative feedback provided for the graded work. Documental analysis informed the key attributes of the semi-structured interview. Interpretive structural modelling (ISM) analysis identified the influence and reliance of each driver.

Findings

This study revealed 15 drivers – 4 fundamental, 6 significant and 5 important – for enhancing assessment and feedback. The level partitioning from the ISM analysis established that all assessment and feedback needs to be underpinned by the university policy and fed into the assessment regime and marking scheme. This study identified that National Student Survey results were significantly improved due to implementing said drivers compared with the national and sector benchmarks.

Practical implications

The developed drivers enable the best practices in assessment setting and feedback provision. The level partition diagram can be used as a decisive guideline or a provisional framework in assessment and feedback provision for quality assurance in HE.

Originality/value

This study is one of, if not the only, to develop a guideline for signposting drivers and their influence and reliance to enhance assessment and feedback in a holistic HE setting. The developed drivers and the level partition diagram bring novelty and add to the current body of knowledge.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The data obtained for the study was based on a project guided by a steering committee within the University of Wolverhampton, chaired by Professor Mohammed Arif. Credit must be given to Mr Anthony Hatfield, Dr Shashank Gupta, Ms Olive White and Ms Jennifer Charlson for their significant input in the data collection. Furthermore, the authors appreciate the students and academic participants for their insightful comments.

Citation

Gomis, K., Saini, M., Arif, M. and Pathirage, C. (2024), "Enhancing the assessment and the feedback in higher education", Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-01-2023-0004

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles