To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below:

Consumer responses to covert advertising in social media

Fabian Göbel (The Nunatak Group GmbH, Munich, Germany)
Anton Meyer (Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany)
B. Ramaseshan (School of Marketing, Curtin University, Perth, Australia)
Silke Bartsch (Institute of Marketing, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany)

Marketing Intelligence & Planning

ISSN: 0263-4503

Article publication date: 7 August 2017

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to contribute to marketing communications literature by exploring consumer responses to covert advertising (CA) in a social media context.

Design/methodology/approach

The persuasion knowledge model was used to explore the impact of CA on brand evaluations. A factorial design experiment was conducted in a social media context (YouTube).

Findings

The results of the study show that triggering knowledge about CA changes the way consumers respond to unfamiliar brands that use such tactics. This implies that for unfamiliar brands, with future development of persuasion knowledge, CA in social media will not only be ineffective but also detrimental with damaging effects on the brand.

Research limitations/implications

An important contribution of this study lies in the application of the persuasion knowledge model to social media context.

Practical implications

The results indicate that firms should desist from covert product and brand communications in social media contexts, and instead employ disclosed brand communications.

Originality/value

Given that the effects of CA have not been investigated in an online context, this study makes a unique contribution to brand communications research by providing valuable insights and better understanding of the effects of CA in social media, specifically YouTube.

Keywords

Citation

Göbel, F., Meyer, A., Ramaseshan, B. and Bartsch, S. (2017), "Consumer responses to covert advertising in social media", Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 35 No. 5, pp. 578-593. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-11-2016-0212

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2017, Emerald Publishing Limited