To read this content please select one of the options below:

Leadership and organizational ambidexterity

Saša Baškarada (Defence Science and Technology Group, Melbourne, Australia)
Jamie Watson (Defence Science and Technology Group, Canberra, Australia)
Jason Cromarty (Defence Science and Technology Group, Canberra, Australia)

Journal of Management Development

ISSN: 0262-1711

Article publication date: 11 July 2016

4146

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to answer calls for more research on how leaders may promote organizational ambidexterity (i.e. exploitation and exploration), and how such behaviors relate to transactional and transformational leadership styles.

Design/methodology/approach

The findings presented in this paper are based on semi-structured interviews with 11 senior leaders in Australian Defence.

Findings

This paper identifies three organizational mechanisms that leaders rely on to promote exploitation, and five behaviors that leaders rely on to promote exploration. These mechanisms and behaviors closely match transactional and transformational leadership styles, respectively.

Originality/value

This paper provides support for the leadership ambidexterity construct, and for the thesis that transformational leadership is appropriate in the context of exploratory innovation, while transactional leadership is appropriate in the context of exploitative innovation.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

© Commonwealth of Australia

Citation

Baškarada, S., Watson, J. and Cromarty, J. (2016), "Leadership and organizational ambidexterity", Journal of Management Development, Vol. 35 No. 6, pp. 778-788. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-01-2016-0004

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Government agency

Related articles