To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below:

Inclusive perspectives or in-depth learning? A longitudinal case study of past debates and future directions in knowledge management for development

Julie Ferguson (Department of Organization Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

Journal of Knowledge Management

ISSN: 1367-3270

Article publication date: 8 February 2016

Downloads
1015

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to analyze how the debate around knowledge management for development has evolved over a 14-year period.

Design/methodology/approach

The study was conducted in an inductive manner, seeking to identify key themes discussed on an online community on knowledge management for development. Analysis comprised observation of the online debate, as well as semantic (co-word) network analysis of a " big data " set, consisting of 14 years of email exchange. The results were verified with the members of the community in a focus group manner.

Findings

In terms of content, the knowledge management for development debate remains strongly engaged with actual development discourse, and it continues to be rather oriented toward tools and methods. In terms of learning, the community appears highly inclusive, and provides fertile ground for in-depth knowledge sharing, but shows less potential for innovative influences.

Research limitations/implications

The study contributes to literature on knowledge management in the non-profit sector by showing how heterogeneous communities in the development domain generate knowledge and shape discourse. More specifically, the paper contributes to knowledge management for development literature by providing a comprehensive overview of how the domain has evolved since its emergence. It also advances knowledge management by showing how inclusive networks can contribute to but also limit learning.

Practical/implications

The study is of use to knowledge management professionals by showing not only the benefits but also the limitations of inclusive knowledge-sharing networks.

Social/implications

The study provides important societal implications by showing which topics are most important to development practitioners, covering the period encompassed by the Millennium Goals.

Originality/value

The paper is the first to provide a comprehensive historical overview of the key topics on knowledge management for development, as engaged by the primary online community on this topic. It also introduces innovative methods for inductive analysis of big data.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges the support provided by Marco Otte of the Network Institute Techlabs, as well as by Loet Leydesdorff and Wouter van Atteveldt for their help in assessing and analyzing the substantial data set underlying this paper. The author also gratefully acknowledges the invitation from and support by the German Development Institute (DIE), to present her work at the “Knowledge for Development” 2014 workshop convened by DIE and KM4Dev, and which inspired her to embark on this analysis. The input provided by host John Akude, facilitator Jaap Pels and workshop participants was also of great value.

Citation

Ferguson, J. (2016), "Inclusive perspectives or in-depth learning? A longitudinal case study of past debates and future directions in knowledge management for development", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 4-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2014-0513

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited