Behavioral validation of the rudeness scale: evidence from retrospective and prospective research
Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research
ISSN: 1759-6599
Article publication date: 11 January 2016
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to behaviorally validate the Rudeness Scale (RS), a self-report measure of the propensity to verbally abuse strangers, using both a retrospective design (Study 1) and a prospective design (Study 2).
Design/methodology/approach
In Study 1, participants (n=280) completed an online survey that contained the RS and a retrospective checklist measure that assessed how often they had engaged in specific confrontational behaviors during the past year. In Study 2 (n=109), participants first completed an online survey that contained the RS and then later completed an experimental session in which they received, and immediately responded to, rude instant messages sent by another “participant.”
Findings
In Study 1, a multiple regression analysis revealed that scores on the RS were positively associated (β=0.39) with scores on the retrospective checklist measure of ugly confrontational behaviors. In Study 2, a multiple regression analysis revealed that scores on the RS were positively associated (β=0.30) with the level of “retaliatory” rude behavior the participants displayed in their instant messaging conversation. Together, these findings reveal that people with high RS scores are more likely, first, to have acted in offensive and confrontational ways in the past (Study 1), and second, to act this way in the present (Study 2).
Originality/value
Although previous studies have provided evidence for the convergent validity of the RS and established a preliminary personality profile of rude individuals, the present studies are the first to explore the behavioral validity of the scale.
Keywords
Citation
Park, A., Robinson, R.L., Babcock, M.J. and Ickes, W. (2016), "Behavioral validation of the rudeness scale: evidence from retrospective and prospective research", Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1108/JACPR-09-2014-0135
Publisher
:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited