To read this content please select one of the options below:

A cross-national investigation into the effects of religion on gender equality

Hamid Yeganeh (Business Admin, College of Business, Winona State University, Winona, Minnesota, USA) (Department of Management, Université Laval, Québec City, Canada)

International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy

ISSN: 0144-333X

Article publication date: 30 April 2021

Issue publication date: 10 May 2022

723

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to analyze the effects of religion on gender equality at the national level.

Design/methodology/approach

The study distinguishes between the concepts of religiosity and religious affiliation and introduces a measure of religious diversity. The study defines religiosity and gender equality as multidimensional concepts and relies on a wide range of secondary data from credible sources such as the World Value Survey, the United Nations, Gender Gap Report and the World Economic Forum to analyze the effect of religious factors on gender equality in more than 70 countries.

Findings

The analyses show that after controlling for the effects of socio-economic development, religiosity tends to impede gender equality. It is found that Muslim and Hinduism affiliations are negatively and Protestant affiliation is positively associated with gender equality. Furthermore, Catholicism and Eastern Orthodox affiliations and religious diversity do not significantly affect gender equality.

Originality/value

At the theoretical level, this study distinguishes between religious affiliations and religiosity and relies on the modernization theory to offer valuable insights into the relationship between religion and gender equality. This study's findings could serve managers and policymakers in dealing with gender disparities in different spheres of social life at the practical level.

Keywords

Citation

Yeganeh, H. (2022), "A cross-national investigation into the effects of religion on gender equality", International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 42 No. 5/6, pp. 434-454. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-10-2020-0479

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles