To read this content please select one of the options below:

Investor protection: effects of takeover convergence

Jyoti Dixit (National Institute of Industrial Engineering, Mumbai, India)
Poonam Singh (Department of Finance and Economics, National Institute of Industrial Engineering, Mumbai, India)
Arunima Haldar (Department of Finance, S.P. Jain Institute of Management and Research, Mumbai, India)

International Journal of Organizational Analysis

ISSN: 1934-8835

Article publication date: 19 August 2021

Issue publication date: 26 May 2023

441

Abstract

Purpose

Takeovers play a critical role as an external corporate governance mechanism to ensure investor protection. There is a long-standing debate on whether the convergence of corporate governance to global standards can enable emerging economies to ensure investor protection. This paper aims to analyse the evolution of the takeover code, namely, Securities Exchange Board of India’s Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers (2011) in India from the lens of investor protection. It then compares the takeover provisions in India, the USA, the UK, Singapore and Australia to examine the extent of convergence and its implications for investor protection.

Design/methodology/approach

Using a cross-national comparative analysis of takeover mechanisms in common law countries, the study analyses the extent and relevance of convergence in form. The focus of the comparison is on regulations governing offer size, offer price, creeping acquisition and initial trigger limit for the mandatory open offer.

Findings

The findings suggest that certain provisions such as the initial trigger threshold for the mandatory offer and the offer prices of the Indian takeover code are converging with the standards in common law countries. However, the offer price determination based on market prices may not reflect true market value in an inefficient market like India. Other provisions such as creeping acquisition and offer size are not only diverging from the international standards but are also inconsistent with the key objective of investor protections of the Indian regulator.

Research limitations/implications

Indian takeover regulation needs to converge to higher global standards to ensure adherence to improved investor protection. This needs to be done for the initial trigger limit for mandatory bid and offer prices, after accounting for the differences in institutional structure. The Indian regulators need to revisit provisions on the initial trigger, creeping acquisition to converge to the broader principle of investor protection.

Originality/value

This technical paper provides a comprehensive depiction of takeover mechanisms in an emerging economy context as a means of investor protection. Further using a comparative lens, it analyses the relevance of convergence of takeover laws. Thus, advances the theoretical knowledge of limited extant work on external corporate governance mechanism in an emerging economy context.

Keywords

Citation

Dixit, J., Singh, P. and Haldar, A. (2023), "Investor protection: effects of takeover convergence", International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 889-906. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-05-2021-2741

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles