To read this content please select one of the options below:

Cryptocurrency in the Darknet: sustainability of the current national legislation

Mohsin Dhali (College of Law, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)
Shafiqul Hassan (College of Law, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)
Saghir Munir Mehar (College of Social Science and Humanities, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA)
Khuram Shahzad (Department of Law, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing, China)
Fazluz Zaman (School of Business and Law, Central Queensland University, Brisbane, Australia)

International Journal of Law and Management

ISSN: 1754-243X

Article publication date: 20 April 2023

Issue publication date: 2 May 2023

508

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the study is to show that divergent perceptions among regulators, the regulated and the associated regulatory bodies across multiple jurisdictions regarding the nature and functionality of cryptocurrencies hamper the development of a more comprehensive and coherent regulatory framework in curbing crimes and other related risks associated with cryptocurrencies.

Design/methodology/approach

The study has used a descriptive doctrinal legal research method to investigate and understand the insights of existing laws and regulations in four selected jurisdictions concerning cryptocurrencies and how these laws could be further improved and developed to reduce crypto-related crimes. Furthermore, the study has also used a comparative research method to conceptualize the contours of the new legal discourse emerging from cryptocurrencies to adopt and implement a sound regulatory framework.

Findings

The study illustrated that divergent regulatory treatment among different jurisdictions might suffocate novel digital innovations such as cryptocurrency. These fragmented regulatory approaches by various jurisdictions question the sustainability of the present national legislation adopted to regulate cryptocurrencies. Looking into other jurisdictional developments in regulating cryptocurrencies, it is apparent that a concerted regulatory approach is needed to minimize the abuse of this innovation.

Research limitations/implications

The study has implications for regulators and policymakers to review the current regulatory framework for regulating cryptocurrencies to prevent regulatory arbitrage. The divergent legislative measures concerning cryptocurrency among different jurisdictions question the sustainability of these legislative initiatives, considering the evolving and borderless nature of cryptocurrency. Therefore, this paper will help regulators to consider the present legislative gaps in establishing a common global regulatory approach in the crypto sphere.

Originality/value

The study contributes to the existing body of literature by examining the regulatory frameworks of four jurisdictions, namely, the USA, Canada, China and the EU, related to cryptocurrencies, with a discussion on the development of cryptocurrencies-related laws among these four jurisdictions and their sustainability in curbing crimes in the Darknet.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Governance and Policy Design Lab (GPDRL).

Citation

Dhali, M., Hassan, S., Mehar, S.M., Shahzad, K. and Zaman, F. (2023), "Cryptocurrency in the Darknet: sustainability of the current national legislation", International Journal of Law and Management, Vol. 65 No. 3, pp. 261-282. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-09-2022-0206

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles