Analysis of e-government and digital society indicators over the years: a comparative study of the EU member states

Abstract

Purpose

Benchmarking e-government and digital society developments using relevant indicators provides crucial insights into what aspects to consider while building a resilient digital society in which digital public services are delivered effectively and sustainably. The purpose of this paper is to analyse selected indices and indicators over the years and provide findings and recommendations on what indicators contribute most to the development.

Design/methodology/approach

A mixed research approach was used to conduct the research and collect, analyse and interpret data. A qualitative analysis involving the search, decomposition and comparison approaches to identify e-government and digital society reports, indices, rankings and indicators was followed by a quantitative analysis comprising of regression and cluster analyses.

Findings

The findings revealed that changes in the mix of indicators used by e-government and digital society indices can be attributed to advances in ICT and channels through which people communicate and receive information. The authors found that digital and telecommunication infrastructures and the quality of their parameters such as broadband have the biggest influence on progress of the e-government and digital societies developments and contribute most to clustering of the EU member states into groups.

Originality/value

The paper provides insights into how the structures of related indices changed over the years and how different indicators contribute to benchmarking of e-government and digital society developments by means of their weights. It provides governments with recommendations on which indicators to focus most.

Citation

Lnenicka, M., Luterek, M. and Majo, L.T. (2024), "Analysis of e-government and digital society indicators over the years: a comparative study of the EU member states", Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, Vol. 26 No. 5, pp. 560-582. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-07-2023-0103