Books and journals Case studies Expert Briefings Open Access
Advanced search

Improving the detection of detainees with suspected intellectual disability in police custody

Iain McKinnon (Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom AND Forensic Services, Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Northgate Hospital, Morpeth, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.)
Julie Thorp (Forensic Services, Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Northgate Hospital, Morpeth, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.)
Don Grubin (Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom AND Forensic Services, Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Bamburgh Clinic, St Nicholas Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.)

Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities

ISSN: 2044-1282

Publication date: 6 July 2015

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is twofold. First to ascertain the efficacy of current police reception screening to detect detainees with intellectual disability (ID). Second to assess the validity of a short targeted screen for ID among police custody detainees.

Design/methodology/approach

The study comprised three stages. First, 248 police custody detainees were assessed for a range of health morbidities, including a pragmatic clinical evaluation of ID. For those with suspected ID, the police custody screens were scrutinised for evidence that this had been detected. Second, a new police health screen, incorporating a short screen for ID, was piloted. Totally, 351 detainees were assessed in the same way as in part 1 with the new screens being scrutinised for evidence that ID had been detected where relevant. Third, the new police screen for ID was validated among a sample of 64 inpatients, some with ID and some without, from forensic inpatient services. Parts 1 and 2 were carried out in the Metropolitan Police Service, London. Part 3 took place in one NHS Trust.

Findings

In parts 1 and 2, the rate of detainees with suspected ID was 2-3 per cent. The standard police screen detected 25 per cent of these detainees in part 1. When the new screen was introduced in part 2, the sensitivity for ID increased to 83 per cent. However, there was no requisite improvement in the proportion of detainees with ID receiving an Appropriate Adult. In the inpatient study, the new screen showed a good level of sensitivity (91 per cent) and reasonable specificity (63 per cent).

Practical implications

It is possible to improve the detection rate of detainees with suspected ID by introducing a short ID screen into the police custody officers’ reception health screen.

Originality/value

The Health Screening of People in Police Custody (HELP-PC) study is a project evaluating screening for health morbidity among police custody detainees. Other data from this study have been reported elsewhere, but this is the first time the data pertaining to ID screening has been reported in detail.

Keywords

  • Intellectual disability
  • Screening
  • Appropriate adults
  • PACE
  • Police custody
  • Vulnerable detainees

Citation

McKinnon, I., Thorp, J. and Grubin, D. (2015), "Improving the detection of detainees with suspected intellectual disability in police custody", Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 174-185. https://doi.org/10.1108/AMHID-04-2015-0015

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2015, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Please note you do not have access to teaching notes

You may be able to access teaching notes by logging in via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
Login
If you think you should have access to this content, click the button to contact our support team.
Contact us

To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below

You may be able to access this content by logging in via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
Login
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.
Rent from Deepdyve
If you think you should have access to this content, click the button to contact our support team.
Contact us
Emerald Publishing
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
© 2021 Emerald Publishing Limited

Services

  • Authors Opens in new window
  • Editors Opens in new window
  • Librarians Opens in new window
  • Researchers Opens in new window
  • Reviewers Opens in new window

About

  • About Emerald Opens in new window
  • Working for Emerald Opens in new window
  • Contact us Opens in new window
  • Publication sitemap

Policies and information

  • Privacy notice
  • Site policies
  • Modern Slavery Act Opens in new window
  • Chair of Trustees governance statement Opens in new window
  • COVID-19 policy Opens in new window
Manage cookies

We’re listening — tell us what you think

  • Something didn’t work…

    Report bugs here

  • All feedback is valuable

    Please share your general feedback

  • Member of Emerald Engage?

    You can join in the discussion by joining the community or logging in here.
    You can also find out more about Emerald Engage.

Join us on our journey

  • Platform update page

    Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

  • Questions & More Information

    Answers to the most commonly asked questions here