Teams and performance appraisal: Using metrics to increase reliability and validity

Matthew Valle (Wichita State University, Wichita, Kansas, USA)
Kirk Davis (Troy State University, Troy, Alabama, USA)

Team Performance Management

ISSN: 1352-7592

Publication date: 1 December 1999

Abstract

Inter‐rater agreement in a peer performance evaluation system was analyzed using a sample of 44 individuals who rated focal persons in seven teams. Objective information concerning individual performance on multiple choice tests, as well as information gleaned from individual contributions to team testing and team graded exercises, resulted in high inter‐rater reliabilities (assessed via ICCs) and strong criterion related validity for the performance evaluation instrument. A discussion centers on the effect of providing objective job performance information to evaluation participants.

Keywords

Citation

Valle, M. and Davis, K. (1999), "Teams and performance appraisal: Using metrics to increase reliability and validity", Team Performance Management, Vol. 5 No. 8, pp. 238-244. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527599910304912

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1999, MCB UP Limited

To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below

You may be able to access this content by logging in via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.
If you think you should have access to this content, click the button to contact our support team.