Search results
1 – 4 of 4Kishan Agarwal, Sharmi Sen, Ghirmai Tesfamariam Teame and Tonmoy Chatterjee
Issues related to economic development and growth are oft discussed to illustrate the health of a nation. However, such development is constrained by the inequality parameter of…
Abstract
Issues related to economic development and growth are oft discussed to illustrate the health of a nation. However, such development is constrained by the inequality parameter of the representative society. Again, economic fluctuations arising from several crises may hinder the representative nation from getting on a smooth path to development. Now, augmentation of crises along with the presence of inequality may trigger economic vulnerabilities, leading to unsustainable economic development. Against this backdrop, we initially frame a theoretical model to capture the above-mentioned issues and try to derive plausible economic interpretations for the same. To verify the same in a more robust manner, we consider a panel of 30 developing countries from Africa, spanning the time period 1980–2020. Both the health status and the education status of our panel of countries are used to explore the sustainability issue in the presence of income inequality. All data have been collected from the World Development Indicators (WDI) and Standardized World Income Inequality Database (SWIID) (Table 21.1
Variables | Description |
---|---|
PCGHE | Domestic General Government Health Expenditure Per Capita (Current US$) |
PCPHE | Domestic Private Health Expenditure Per Capita (Current US$) |
PCOPE | Out-of-Pocket Expenditure Per Capita (Current US$) |
LE | Life Expectancy at Birth, Total (Years) |
IMR | Mortality Rate, Infant Per 1,000 Live (Birth) |
GEE | Government Expenditure on Education, Total (% of GDP) |
PSE | School Enrolment, Primary (% gross) |
SSE | School Enrolment, Secondary (% gross) |
PCGDP | GDP Per Capita (Current US$) |
GRCGDP | GDP Per Capita Growth (Current US$) |
FDI | Foreign Direct Investment, Net Inflow (% of GDP) |
POP | Population, Total |
GINI | Gini Index of Net Income Inequality |
Variables Description.
Details
Keywords
Harold Delfín Angulo Bustinza, Wilmer Florez Garcia, Valentín Calderón Contreras, Dagoberto Peña Cobeñas, Madeley Barrientos Moscoso and Valeria Zeballos Ponce
Mehwish Ali, Majdi Hassen and Sarmad Saeed Sheikh
This study investigates the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on corporate innovation. We selected the listed nonfinancial firms of South Asian Economies. The sample…
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on corporate innovation. We selected the listed nonfinancial firms of South Asian Economies. The sample of the study comprised a total of 426 listed manufacturing firms of South Asian Countries for period spans 10 years from 2012 to 2021. In this study, descriptive statistics, multicollinearity diagnostic tests, correlation analysis and two-step dynamic panel system generalized method of moments (GMM) were applied to analyze the data. CSR measured with three proxies' social indicators, environmental indicators, and CSR composite index of social and environmental indicators. However, corporate innovation is captured with number of citations received in a year and number of patents filed in the year. Overall, findings of the study using all measures of CSR shows that CSR significantly and positively related with corporate innovation. Our results find support for CSR-innovation view with all measures of CSR. The findings suggest that the current study is helpful for managers, regulators, policymakers, and researchers. For managers, the study helps them to make the CSR and innovation decision. The policymakers should take appropriate innovative decision while considering factors such as CSR. This study can also be extended by considering this study for developed and emerging economies sample.
Details
Keywords
“First principles” of international business (IB) thinking should be applied systematically when assessing the functioning of internationally operating firms. The most important…
Abstract
“First principles” of international business (IB) thinking should be applied systematically when assessing the functioning of internationally operating firms. The most important first principle is that entrepreneurially oriented firms seek to create, deliver and capture economic value through cross-border linkages. Such linkages invariably require complementary resources from a variety of parties with idiosyncratic vulnerabilities to be meshed. Starting from first principles allows bringing to light evidence-based insight. For instance, most companies are not global and even the world’s largest firms rarely change the location of key strategic functions. International new ventures (INVs), emerging economy multinational enterprises (MNEs) and family firms face unique vulnerabilities but also command resources that can be used to create value across borders. The quest for “optimal” international diversification appears to be a futile academic exercise, and in emerging economies with institutional voids, relational networks – and more broadly, informal institutions – are unlikely to function as scalable substitutes for formal institutions. In global value chains (GVCs), many lead firms and their partners have been able to craft governance mechanisms that reduce bounded rationality and bounded reliability challenges, and it is also critical for them to use governance as a tool to create entrepreneurial space. Finally, many of the world’s largest companies have been on successful trajectories toward reducing their climate change footprint for a few decades. But these firm-specific trajectories are fraught with challenges and cannot just be imposed via unilateral, macro-level targets decided upon by individuals and institutions lacking a clear understanding of innovation and capital expenditure processes in business.
Details