Search results
1 – 4 of 4Michaela Jánská, Marta Žambochová and Zuzana Vacurová
This paper aims to explore the recognition and success of different ways of branding native advertising in influencer marketing.
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to explore the recognition and success of different ways of branding native advertising in influencer marketing.
Design/methodology/approach
The data are evaluated using statistical tests, correlation and cluster analysis.
Findings
It was found that the higher the recognition rate of a post tagged in a particular way, the better the tagging method for influencer marketing on Instagram. Based on the findings of this study, word tag is recommended first because it is flexible and has one of the highest recognition rates.
Research limitations/implications
The generalizability of the results across different regional settings requires further investigation.
Practical implications
Good labeling of native advertising leads to greater success.
Originality/value
This study can be used by marketing managers, advertisers and influencers to gain insight into the issue, as well as to better select the appropriate labeling method for their advertising content.
Objetivo
Este trabajo tiene como objetivo explorar el reconocimiento y el éxito de diferentes formas de branding de publicidad nativa en el marketing de influencers.
Diseño/metodología/enfoque
Los datos se evalúan mediante pruebas estadísticas, correlación y análisis de conglomerados.
Resultados
Se encontró que cuanto mayor es la tasa de reconocimiento de un post etiquetado de una manera particular, mejor es el método de etiquetado para el marketing de influencers en Instagram. Basándose en los resultados de este estudio, se recomienda en primer lugar el etiquetado por palabras porque es flexible y tiene una de las tasas de reconocimiento más altas.
Implicaciones prácticas
Un buen etiquetado de la publicidad nativa conduce a un mayor éxito.
Originalidad
Este estudio puede ser utilizado por directores de marketing, anunciantes e influencers para obtener información sobre el tema, así como para seleccionar mejor el método de etiquetado adecuado para su contenido publicitario.
Limitaciones/Implicaciones de la investigación
La generalizabilidad de los resultados en diferentes entornos regionales requiere más investigación.
目的
本文旨在探讨影响者营销中不同方式的品牌原生广告的识别和成功。
方法
使用统计测试、相关性和聚类分析对数据进行评估。
研究结果
研究发现, 以特定方式标记的帖子的识别率越高, Instagram上影响者营销的标记方式就越好。基于这项研究的结果, 首先推荐单词标签, 因为它很灵活, 而且有最高的识别率之一。
实际意义
对原生广告进行良好的标注会带来更大的成功。
原创性
本研究可供营销经理、广告商和影响者使用, 以深入了解这一问题, 并更好地为其广告内容选择合适的标签方法。
研究局限性
研究结果在不同地区环境中的普适性需要进一步调查。
Details
Keywords
Rumen Pozharliev, Dario Rossi and Matteo De Angelis
This paper aims to examine a two-way interaction between social influencers’ number of followers (micro vs meso) and argument quality (weak vs strong) on consumers’ self-reported…
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to examine a two-way interaction between social influencers’ number of followers (micro vs meso) and argument quality (weak vs strong) on consumers’ self-reported and brain responses to advertising posts on Instagram. Further, drawing upon source credibility theory and contemporary theories of persuasion, the Instagram users’ perceptions of the influencer’s credibility are predicted to mediate the hypothesized effects.
Design/methodology/approach
Through an online (N = 192) and a lab study (N = 112), the authors examined Instagram users’ responses to an advertising post from Instagram influencers in terms of perceived source credibility and electronic word-of-mouth intention, using validated multi-item scales from existing literatures and electroencephalogram (EEG) measures. The hypotheses were tested with a 2 (type of influencer: micro vs meso) × 2 (argument quality: weak vs strong) between-subject design using mediated moderated linear regression analysis.
Findings
The results highlight that meso-influencers are perceived as a credible source of information only when their product-related post provides strong argument quality. Moreover, this process involves an increase in users’ cognitive work (measured with EEG), with possible implications on marketing communication strategies and online message design.
Research limitations/implications
The limitations of the work can serve as ideas for future research. First, this study did not account for the influencer’s relevance and resonance. Second, the authors studied consumer responses to online communication produced by Instagram influencers within a single product category. Another important product type distinction that requires further attention is between hedonic and utilitarian products. Finally, the two studies only used positive review content. Further research should study how consumers evaluate the source credibility of a micro- vs meso-influencer when they are exposed to negative reviews containing weak vs strong arguments.
Practical implications
The results suggest that marketers should carefully consider Instagram influencers based on the trade-offs between credibility and reach. Specifically, micro-influencers are perceived as more credible sources of information than meso-influencers, which means that they have greater potential to affect Instagram users’ behavior. Moreover, the results suggest that meso-influencers should leverage argument quality to enhance their credibility and draw greater positive outcomes for the products and brands they endorse.
Originality/value
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to investigate how the interaction between the type of social media influencer and the argument quality affects consumers’ self-reported and brain responses to advertising posts on Instagram. Moreover, using neuroscience, this study aims to shed light on the neurophysiological processes that drive consumer responses to product-related communication posted by different influencer types.
Details