Search results

1 – 2 of 2
Article
Publication date: 1 October 1999

Marcus Blosch and Jiju Antony

The Royal Navy’s manpower planning system represents a highly complex queue which aims to provide sufficient manpower to meet both operational and structural commitments. This…

Abstract

The Royal Navy’s manpower planning system represents a highly complex queue which aims to provide sufficient manpower to meet both operational and structural commitments. This queue is affected by many variables and therefore it is essential to understand the influence of these variables and also the interactions (if any) among the variables. Experimental design (ED) is a potent technique to accomplish the above objective. As real experimentation was impractical and infeasible, a computer‐based simulation was developed to model the system which needs to be studied. This paper illustrates how computer simulation and experimental design was applied to identify the key risk variables within the manpower planning system at the UK’s Royal Navy.

Details

Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, vol. 9 no. 5
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0960-4529

Keywords

Article
Publication date: 1 August 2002

David Preece, Marcus Blosch and John Strain

The paper examines a recent example of work and employment restructuring in the Royal Navy. This involved the creation of a new employment branch (the Warfare Branch) out of two…

1222

Abstract

The paper examines a recent example of work and employment restructuring in the Royal Navy. This involved the creation of a new employment branch (the Warfare Branch) out of two former branches: the Operations Branch and the Weapon Engineering Branch. The case study is used as a vehicle for exploring whether, and if so in what senses, technical change can be argued to have contributed to this organizational restructuring, within the wider contexts and dynamics of change.

Details

Personnel Review, vol. 31 no. 4
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0048-3486

Keywords

Access

Year

Content type

Article (2)
1 – 2 of 2