Search results

1 – 3 of 3
Content available

Abstract

Details

Assembly Automation, vol. 25 no. 2
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0144-5154

Keywords

Article
Publication date: 25 October 2013

John L. Abernathy, Michael Barnes and Chad Stefaniak

For the past 10 years, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) has operated as an independent overseer of public company audits. Over 70 percent of PCAOB studies…

Abstract

For the past 10 years, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) has operated as an independent overseer of public company audits. Over 70 percent of PCAOB studies have been published since 2010, evidencing the increasing relevance of PCAOB-related research in recent years. Our paper reviews the existing literature on the PCAOB’s four primary functions – registration, standard-setting, inspections, and enforcement. In particular, we examine PCAOB registration trends and evaluate the effects of PCAOB registration requirements on the issuer audit market, as well as discuss the relative costs and benefits (e.g., auditor behavior changes, improvements in audit quality, auditor perceptions) of the 16 auditing standards the PCAOB passed in its first 10 years of operation. Further, we summarize the literature’s findings on the effects of the PCAOB inspection process on various facets of audit quality. Finally, we analyze the research concerning the PCAOB’s enforcement actions to determine how markets have responded to sanctions against auditors and audit firms. We contend that understanding and reviewing the effects of the PCAOB’s activities are important to future audit research because of the PCAOB’s authority over and oversight of the issuer audit profession. We also identify PCAOB-related research areas that have not been fully explored and propose several research questions intended to address these research areas.

Details

Journal of Accounting Literature, vol. 32 no. 1
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0737-4607

Keywords

Article
Publication date: 1 September 1999

David J. Sherwin and Basim Al‐Najjar

Markov models find optimum inspection intervals for phased deterioration of monitored complex components in a system with severe down time costs. The number of (pseudo)‐phases can…

Abstract

Markov models find optimum inspection intervals for phased deterioration of monitored complex components in a system with severe down time costs. The number of (pseudo)‐phases can be increased, but in most cases, simple models tracking actual states and their perception by the user will suffice, because of paucity of data and near‐constant rates. The matrix is cyclic; it includes renewal and regression to earlier states, simplifying solution and matching observation. An example involves roller bearings in paper mills with three phases, no defect, possible defect, and final deterioration towards failure. In the last phase, continuous monitoring is used.

Details

Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, vol. 5 no. 3
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1355-2511

Keywords

1 – 3 of 3