Search results

11 – 20 of 403
Article
Publication date: 1 April 2008

Chris Fox and John Pitts

Abstract

Details

Safer Communities, vol. 7 no. 2
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1757-8043

Article
Publication date: 1 July 2008

John Pitts and Chris Fox

Abstract

Details

Safer Communities, vol. 7 no. 3
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1757-8043

Article
Publication date: 19 July 2010

Chris Fox and Tim Bateman

Abstract

Details

Safer Communities, vol. 9 no. 3
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1757-8043

Article
Publication date: 1 April 2007

Chris Fox and John Pitts

Abstract

Details

Safer Communities, vol. 6 no. 2
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1757-8043

Article
Publication date: 1 December 2007

Chris Fox and John Pitts

Abstract

Details

Safer Communities, vol. 6 no. 4
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1757-8043

Content available
Article
Publication date: 10 October 2011

Tim Bateman and Chris Fox

409

Abstract

Details

Safer Communities, vol. 10 no. 4
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1757-8043

Content available
Article
Publication date: 15 July 2011

Tim Bateman and Chris Fox

370

Abstract

Details

Safer Communities, vol. 10 no. 3
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1757-8043

Content available
Article
Publication date: 13 July 2012

Tim Bateman and Chris Fox

176

Abstract

Details

Safer Communities, vol. 11 no. 3
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1757-8043

Article
Publication date: 11 January 2013

Mark Ellison, Chris Fox, Adrian Gains and Gary Pollock

Established in 2007, Vision Housing is a small London‐based specialist housing provider working primarily with ex‐offenders. This study seeks to evaluate the impact of Vision…

Abstract

Purpose

Established in 2007, Vision Housing is a small London‐based specialist housing provider working primarily with ex‐offenders. This study seeks to evaluate the impact of Vision Housing's provision of housing and support on re‐offending rates.

Design/methodology/approach

The evaluation design compared expected re‐offending rates after one year calculated using offender group reconviction scale (OGRS3) with actual reoffending rates after one year based on data from the police national computer (PNC). “Re‐offending” was defined in line with the current Ministry of Justice definition based on “proven re‐offending”.

Findings

The predicted rate of proven re‐offending for 400 clients referred to Vision over 12 months was 40.7 per cent. Their actual proven re‐offending rate over 12 months was 37.0 per cent. This is 3.7 percentage points less than the predicted proven re‐offending rate, equivalent to a 9.1 per cent reduction in proven re‐offending. This result was statistically significant. Analysis also suggested that Vision Housing is more successful with women; offenders under the age of 35; offenders referred by the Prison and Probation Service; offenders with a higher predicted risk of proven re‐offending; and offenders who had committed more serious offences.

Research limitations/implications

The evaluation conducted to date does not include a comparison group and therefore has relatively low levels of internal validity.

Practical implications

The authors are not aware of any UK studies of the impact of housing on re‐offending that have successfully used a more methodologically robust evaluation design. Until such studies are carried out, the results of the current study should be of great interest to policy‐makers and those delivering rehabilitative services to ex‐offenders in partnership with third sector organisations.

Originality/value

This study has produced evidence of the impact of housing on recidivism and quantified that impact.

Details

Safer Communities, vol. 12 no. 1
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1757-8043

Keywords

Article
Publication date: 19 July 2010

Chris Fox

Community safety partnerships have a new statutory duty to reduce reoffending. A key stage in developing a strategy to do this is to understand the problem. The development of…

Abstract

Community safety partnerships have a new statutory duty to reduce reoffending. A key stage in developing a strategy to do this is to understand the problem. The development of offender problem profiles will be an important part of the process. This article, drawing on experience from local partnerships, discusses how partnerships might go about developing offender problem profiles.

Details

Safer Communities, vol. 9 no. 3
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1757-8043

Keywords

11 – 20 of 403