Search results

The purpose of this chapter is to reflect the impact of mergers and acquisitions processes on performance of Islamic banking industry in the United Kingdom through studying within.

The present research uses explanatory approach in order to examine the research problems, methodology used in the research is quantitative methods through calculating the long-term share prices performance of the UK Islamic banks’ sample. First, the researchers use the control Islamic bank in the event-time approach. The researchers calculate annual abnormal returns using the buy-and-hold abnormal return (BHAR) method over a period of five years, counting from the quarter of a year when the transaction is said to be effective.

The research findings found that there are significant differences in the Islamic mergers and acquisitions post-long-run performance of the UK Islamic banks to the control the crises that face the United Kingdom from 2007 to 2010. However, the acquiring Islamic bank in high-tech industries had a negative effect on their long-term performance.

The present research has been applied for the Islamic banking industry in the United Kingdom after the Western Europe industry from 2007 to 2010.

The main implementations of the present research is valuing UK banks carried out the Islamic mergers and acquisitions of a broad range of management disciplines encompassing the financial, strategic, behavioral, operational, and cross-cultural aspects of this challenging and high-risk activity.

The Islamic mergers and acquisitions have placed a significant amount of value added on the motivation of large banks for engaging in banking mergers and acquisitions’ transactions.

This paper aims to examine how international banking groups manage their branding in the context of successive mergers and acquisitions. It seeks to review of a number of case histories in order to show that banking companies tend to evolve a multi‐tiered system for absorbing and rebranding acquisitions and it also seeks to present a general framework to guide future research and practice.

The banking industry has been undergoing major consolidation in recent years, with a number of global players emerging through successive mergers and acquisitions. These transactions vary in scale and location, from major mergers of large, equal‐sized international entities to acquisitions of smaller, local businesses in various countries all around the world. This paper brings together the literature on mergers and acquisitions, which mostly comes from economics and finance, with the marketing literature on branding and rebranding, to create a framework to help us to understand the management challenge of rebranding bank brands in this context. Citigroup and Crédit Agricole are used as a preliminary test of this framework.

This analysis suggests that the branding problem varies according to the size and international status of the acquisitive bank. Very large banks with international brands such as Citigroup tend to follow a branded house strategy where they impose their master brand on all acquisitions resulting in a further enhancement of scale and brand strength. However, this general strategy conceals a more complex, multi‐tiered approach with different types and sizes of acquisitions being rebranded in different ways. Regional players such as Crédit Agricole tend to opt for a house of brands strategy where their acquired companies retain their own name and brand franchise in local markets.

The framework presented here is entirely new and requires further testing. The evidence supplied here is interesting but preliminary and requires further validation.

Most banking companies nowadays become involved in mergers and acquisitions at some stage, and face the task of realigning their brands in the aftermath of these transactions. This paper provides a systematic framework backed up by empirical evidence to help them to make these decisions.

The paper addresses a critically important strategic issue that has not been addressed in any detail in the marketing literature. The paper provides preliminary research evidence and a framework to suggest hypotheses for further research.

The purpose of this paper is to test whether bank mergers are driven by equity overvaluation and management compensation incentives.

To test whether equity mispricing drive bank mergers, the authors employ two alternative price-to-residual income valuation (P/V) measures for bidders and targets while the authors control for their growth prospects with the price-to-book (P/B) (two years before) ratio. The intrinsic value (V) is estimated using the three-period forecast horizon residual income model of Ohlson (1995) and perpetual residual income model that does not rely on analysts’ forecasts of future earnings prospects. The latter measure allows the authors to estimate V for a much larger sample of banks. The empirical analysis is supplemented with a standard event analysis and assessment of the long-term performance of bank mergers subsequent to the announcement date.

The evidence shows that bidders are overvalued relative to their targets, especially in equity offer deals. The authors also find that highly valued bidders: are more likely to use stock than cash; are willing to pay more relative to the target market price; are more likely to acquire private than public targets; earn lower announcement-period returns; fail to create synergy gains; experience long-term underperformance; and reward their top managers of with large compensation increases subsequent to mergers.

This study provides results consistent with the view that behavioral and managerial incentives play an important role in motivating bank mergers.

Presents the results of a telephone survey of 801 consumers concerning the relationship between bank mergers and service quality perceptions. The setting of the study is a US state which has seen much merger activity. The survey results provide evidence of a significant relationship between bank mergers and service quality perceptions that differs based on the demographic characteristics of the respondents. Among these demographic characteristics are gender, ethnicity, education, and income. In addition to the survey results, the article also contains several managerial implications, including a need for complementarity of marketing strategies for both acquired and non‐acquired banks.

During the 1990s, the banking sector experienced an important consolidation process in most developed countries, where mergers and acquisitions (M&As) between credit institutions reached unprecedented levels. Financial deregulation and technological progress have played an important role in this process (Berger, Demsetz & Strahan 1999). These, among other factors, may have intensified the synergy derived from size and facilitated an improvement in the management of the acquired institutions. In order to evaluate the importance of these two factors, we carry out a multinomial logit analysis of the characteristics of continental European financial institutions prior to their participation in merger and/or acquisition operations between 1995 and 2001. Our results demonstrate that size is an important factor in mergers and acquisitions, but it is not clear that economies of scale are sought with these types of deals. In turn, improving the management of the acquired institutions has played an important role in this process.

This study aims to examine the nature of relationship that exists between merger and acquisition (M&A) and banks’ asset turnover (AT) following M&As that took place during the 2004 and 2008 banking sector reforms.

Considering the fact that this study is empirical, the authors adopted the quantitative research method relying on financial industry data. Being a matched-sample comparison, the study evaluated whether the merged banks outperformed the stand-alone banks as a result of their involvement in M&As. Using data extracted from the annual financial reports of the banks, mean AT ratios were computed. Chow test for structural break, paired sample and independent sample t-tests were performed on the mean AT ratios to gauge the impact of M&A.

The findings suggest that there is no positive relationship between M&A and banks’ AT as either the AT ratios of the banks deteriorated or at best, did not improve significantly. Furthermore, the evidence suggests that the stand-alone banks outperformed the merged banks following M&As in Nigeria.

The major practical implication of this empirical study is that M&A has not been able to solve the fundamental problems of banks in Nigeria. Apart from improving their liquidity constraints, the unresolved problems of banks in Nigeria include poor corporate governance compliance, poor credit risk management policy and ineffective allocation of capital to businesses.

This study supports the Keynesian argument for effective regulation supervision and control of the economy in general and financial institutions.

In the context of increasing consolidation in the banking industry, this research examined one of the motives for bank acquisitions and the kinds of acquisitions made by banking firms. The effect of ownership concentration was tested on the absolute level of bank acquisitions and the average degree of geographic‐market overlap of these acquisitions. In a sample of 156 banking firms, banks featuring dispersed ownership were found to acquire other banks with less market‐overlap than did banking firms with concentrated ownership. However, ownership concentration was not a significant predictor of the absolute level of merger activity. Implications of these differences in acquisition strategies are explored.

A thick cost frontier methodology is used to estimate pre‐ and postmerger X‐inefficiency in 348 mergers approved by the OCC in 1987/88. Efficiency improved in only a small majority of mergers, and these gains were unrelated to the acquiring bank's efficiency advantage over its target. These results are not consistent with the traditional market for corporate control story, in which well‐managed firms acquire poorly managed firms and subsequently improve their performance. Rather, the results suggest motivations other than cost efficiencies were driving U.S. bank mergers in the late 1980s. Efficiency gains were concentrated in mergers where acquiring banks made frequent acquisitions, suggesting the presence of experience effects.

This study aims to determine the factors affecting the merger and acquisition (M&A) process in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) banking sector. It distinguishes between internal and external factors that may motivate M&A activities in the banking sector.

This study adopts quantitative research and a survey strategy for data collection. A model was developed using a survey e-mailed to 500 bankers to gather data on the factors affecting the banking sector’s M&A.

This study’s findings provide strong empirical evidence for factors extracted by the factor analysis (Income, Growth, Costs, Survival, Diversifications, Security and Risk and Legal), which are important in determining the consolidation process leading to successful M&A in the banking industry. This study also contributes to the business combinations and consolidation literature by explaining the important factors in measuring the bank’s performance during the M&A process.

Future studies could be directed in many directions. First, the authors extend the study to other GCC countries and examine whether the determinants of banks’ M&A are similar across markets. Second, the authors examine additional nonfinancial bank-specific characteristics, such as management incentives and corporate governance or additional market characteristics. Third, the authors examine the motives for acquisitions of foreign banks by UAE banks and vice versa. There may be much to learn about how acquisition motives are likely to differ.

The findings can help bank managers know if their banks have developed the same profile or factors similar to typical target banks. The theoretical understanding of the importance of this study in creating an environment of trust that governs the behavior of bankers for both banks will reduce the agency issue. Regarding general management, this study indicates that opportunistic behaviors could interest banks, bankers’ associations, central banks, governments, other financial authorities and policymakers. Therefore, this study paves the way for further investigation of mergers, agency theory and ethics issues. These banks’ owners, managers and regulators were also advised to consider these factors in formulating their policies and processes, given their influence on performance and their ability to manage the relationship between banks and improve the efficiency of the UAE banking sector.

This study provides new perspectives concerning motives leading financial institutions to M&A owing to banks’ decisions to improve their financial positions, coupled with the need to obey pressures of macro factors such as economic, legal and political systems, government and technology.

The recent wave of mergers and acquisitions in the financial institutions all over the developed nations has also taken its toll in Malaysia. Factors such as globalization, liberalization and information technology developments have contributed to the need for a more competitive, resilient and robust financial systems in Malaysia. This is added by the recent 1997 Asian financial crisis, which contributed for speeding the mergers and acquisitions process in the Malaysian banking sector. The end result is the formation of ten anchor banks from a total of 54 financial institutions as at end of 2001. This paper has explored the causes and the process of the mergers and acquisitions as well as the future implications in the Malaysian banking system.