Search results

An intelligent personal assistant for personal computers (PCs) is a vital application for the current generation. The current computer personal assistant services checking frameworks are not proficient at removing significant data from PCs and long-range informal communication information.

The proposed verbalizers use long short-term memory to classify the user task and give proper guidelines to the users. The outcomes show that the proposed method determinedly handles heterogeneous information and improves precision. The main advantage of long short-term memory is that handle the long-term dependencies in the input data.

The proposed model gives the 22% mean absolute error. The proposed method reduces mean square error than support vector machine (SVM), convolutional neural network (CNN), multilayer perceptron (MLP) and K-nearest neighbors (KNN).

This paper fulfills the necessity of intelligent personal assistant for PCs using verbalizer.

This study aims to demonstrate what myths of and about science are reproduced in this popular cultural work (movie – “Oppenheimer”). This is done by examining the unconscious hegemonic positions supported by the reproduction of stereotypical and mythical images of science.

Content/Text Analysis: The conceptual analysis of a cultural text – a film (“Oppenheimer”) – through a theoretical apparatus (B. Latour’s theory).

The film demonstrates its reproduction of three distinct elements. Firstly, it exhibits classic scientistic clichés pertaining to technoscience. Secondly, it highlights the replication of the individualized monomyth about the (super) hero, leading to the exclusion of the intricate conditions of technoscience’s existence. Lastly, the film aligns with the Californian ideology, as proposed by Barbrook.

The value of the text is twofold: (1) To show that the classical approaches of Bruno Latour are still relevant. (2) To show what hidden premises and myths about technoscience are being propagated through a work of pop culture (the film “Oppenheimer”) and, in effect, to show what kind of influence of cultural hegemony is at work here.