Search results

This paper aims to conduct an interdisciplinary systematic literature review (SLR) of fake news research and to advance the socio-technical understanding of digital information practices and platforms in business and management studies.

The paper applies a focused, SLR method to analyze articles on fake news in business and management journals from 2010 to 2020.

The paper analyzes the definition, theoretical frameworks, methods and research gaps of fake news in the business and management domains. It also identifies some promising research opportunities for future scholars.

The paper offers practical implications for various stakeholders who are affected by or involved in fake news dissemination, such as brands, consumers and policymakers. It provides recommendations to cope with the challenges and risks of fake news.

The paper discusses the social consequences and future threats of fake news, especially in relation to social networking and social media. It calls for more awareness and responsibility from online communities to prevent and combat fake news.

The paper contributes to the literature on information management by showing the importance and consequences of fake news sharing for societies. It is among the frontier systematic reviews in the field that covers studies from different disciplines and focuses on business and management studies.

Existing research has predominantly concentrated on examining the factors that impact consumer decisions through the lens of potential consumer motivations, neglecting the sentiment mechanisms that propel guest behavioral intentions. This study endeavors to systematically analyze the underlying mechanisms governing how negative reviews exert an influence on potential consumer decisions.

This paper constructs an “Aspect-based sentiment accumulation” index, a negative or positive affect load, reflecting the degree of consumer sentiment based on affect infusion model and aspect-based sentiment analysis. Initially, it verifies the causal relationship between aspect-based negative load and consumer decisions using ordinary least squares regression. Then, it analyzes the threshold effects of negative affect load on positive affect load and the threshold effects of positive affect load on negative affect load using a panel threshold regression model.

Aspect-based negative reviews significantly impact consumers’ decisions. Negative affect load and positive affect load exhibit threshold effects on each other, with threshold values varying according to the overall volume of reviews. As the total number of reviews increases, the impact of negative affect load diminishes. The threshold effects for positive affect load showed a predominantly U-shaped course of change. Hosts respond promptly and enthusiastically with detailed, lengthy text, which can aid in mitigating the impact of negative reviews.

The study extends the application of the affect infusion model and enriches the conditions for its theoretical scope. It addresses the research gap by focusing on the threshold effects of negative or positive review sentiment on decision-making in sharing accommodations.