To read this content please select one of the options below:

Ethical considerations in synthesising research ‐ Whose representations?

Harsh Suri (Monash University, Melbourne)

Qualitative Research Journal

ISSN: 1443-9883

Article publication date: 6 April 2008



Research syntheses play a powerful role in shaping further research, practice, policy and public perceptions. Accordingly, the ethical issues associated with how perspectives of different groups are included or censored in a research synthesis report must be paid adequate attention. Any research synthesis is inherently influenced by subjectivities associated with multiple layers of interpretation, selection and representation. In framing a research synthesis, it is vital that synthesists take into account: multiple interests and influences of different stakeholders; potential impact of the synthesis on different stakeholders; synthesists’ own multiple and shifting identities within the synthesis; synthesists’ methodological positioning within the synthesis; status accorded to authors and participants of the primary research studies included in the synthesis; influences of funding agencies; politics of who/what gets published; and biases introduced through common strategies for retrieving primary research studies. I have raised strategic questions and issues to structure and inform critical decision‐making throughout a synthesis process. I hope this article will stimulate debate and discussion on various ethical considerations associated with the process of synthesising research.



Suri, H. (2008), "Ethical considerations in synthesising research ‐ Whose representations?", Qualitative Research Journal, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 63-73.



Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2008, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles