To read this content please select one of the options below:

Health, Safety and Industrial Democracy: Some Further Considerations

Phil Beaumont (Lecturer, Department of Social Economic Research, University of Glasgow)
Robert Coyte (Lecturers Centre for Industrial Democracy, University of Glasgow)
John Leopold (Lecturers Centre for Industrial Democracy, University of Glasgow)

Employee Relations

ISSN: 0142-5455

Article publication date: 1 January 1981

405

Abstract

In a recent article in this journal Geoffrey Stuttard argued that the provisions of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 which provide for union appointed safety representatives have important implications for extending industrial democracy. The essence of this line of argument is that the subject area of workplace health and safety, which has for so long been dominated by unilateral management decision making at the individual workplace and a framework of common and statute law that has taken a highly “paternalistic” attitude towards the issue of employee and union involvement, is to become at least an area of extensive joint discussion, and possible one of joint decision making.

Citation

Beaumont, P., Coyte, R. and Leopold, J. (1981), "Health, Safety and Industrial Democracy: Some Further Considerations", Employee Relations, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 23-27. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb054963

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1981, MCB UP Limited

Related articles