To read this content please select one of the options below:

How do Danish humanities PhD school leaders constitute their roles? Interactions of biography, place and time

Lynn McAlpine (Department of Educational Counselling and Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada)
Andrew Gibson (Department of Philosophy of Education, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland)
Søren Smedegaard Bengtsen (Department of Educational Philosophy and General Education, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark)

Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education

ISSN: 2398-4686

Article publication date: 17 September 2024

29

Abstract

Purpose

Increasingly governmental policy around PhD education has resulted in greater university oversight of programs and student experience – often through creating central PhD Schools. While student experience is well researched, the experiences of Heads of these units, who are responsible for creating student experience, have been invisible. This exploratory Danish case study begins such a conversation: its purpose to examine the perceptions of five Heads of PhD Humanities Schools, each responsible for steering institutional decisions within Danish PhD policy landscapes.

Design/methodology/approach

A qualitative approach integrated three distinct analyses: a review of Danish PhD education policies and university procedures, each university’s job specifications for the Heads of the Schools and the Heads’ views on their responsibilities.

Findings

The Heads differentiated between their own and today’s PhD student experience. They had held prior leadership roles and fully supported institutional regulations. They cared deeply for the students under their charge and were working to achieve personal goals to enhance PhD experience. Their leadership perspective was relational: enhancing individual student learning through engaging with multiple PhD actors (e.g. program leaders) – when possible at a personal level – to improve PhD practices.

Originality/value

This study contributes an expanded perspective on how PhD School Heads constitute their roles by empirically linking: macro-national policies and institutional regulations and individuals’ biographies to their support of the PhD regimes – with implications for academic leadership generally. The authors argue research into PhD School leadership is essential, as it is such individuals who create the organisational settings that students experience.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This study was partially supported by a Danish Sapere Aude grant.

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This study was partially supported by a Danish Sapere Aude grant.

Citation

McAlpine, L., Gibson, A. and Bengtsen, S.S. (2024), "How do Danish humanities PhD school leaders constitute their roles? Interactions of biography, place and time", Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-10-2023-0097

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles