To read this content please select one of the options below:

Environmental investment growth (EIG) and corporate cost stickiness in China: substantive or symbolic management?

Fei Xu (Department of Economic and Management, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, China)
XinZhu Liu (Department of Economic and Management, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, China)
Qian Liu (Department of Economic and Management, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, China)
XiaoYang Zhu (Department of Business Administratio, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou, China)
DuanMing Zhou (Department of Economic and Management, Hefei Normal University, Hefei, China)

Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal

ISSN: 2040-8021

Article publication date: 30 October 2023

Issue publication date: 2 January 2024

203

Abstract

Purpose

Considering the greenwashing risk of symbolic environmental management, this study aims to distinguish the motivation for environmental investment growth (EIG) from the corporate cost stickiness and anti-stickiness perspectives.

Design/methodology/approach

This study analyzes the impact of substantive and symbolic environmental management on cost stickiness. Subsequently, competing hypotheses are proposed. Finally, empirical tests are conducted on Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2019.

Findings

EIG significantly improves enterprises’ cost stickiness. The cost of high EIG enterprises does not decrease significantly with a decline in income compared to other enterprises, which is consistent with the motivation for substantive environmental management. Enterprises with high asset specificity and optimistic management expectations show more obvious substantive environmental management. Government and public environmental concerns cause more pronounced substantive environmental management.

Practical implications

An evaluation of corporate environmental responsibility should take into account both what the company has disclosed and what it has actually done.

Social implications

Governments and the public should have a comprehensive understanding of corporate environmental management. They need to strengthen their ability to recognize symbolic environmental management and support substantive environmental management.

Originality/value

Fundamental to the evaluation of corporate environmental responsibility, this study distinguishes the motivations for corporate EIG disclosures from the cost stickiness perspective to avoid the risk of greenwashing. Hypotheses on the impact of substantive and symbolic environmental management on cost stickiness are presented. This study verifies the substantive environmental management characteristics of listed Chinese companies.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Funding: This work was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (Grant Number 23BJY104).

Citation

Xu, F., Liu, X., Liu, Q., Zhu, X. and Zhou, D. (2024), "Environmental investment growth (EIG) and corporate cost stickiness in China: substantive or symbolic management?", Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 148-170. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-02-2023-0050

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles