Canada
action research case study
, 152
Community Campus Engage Canada
, 152
undergraduate university in
, 9
union contracts in
, 160
Cape Peninsula University of Education (CPUT)
, 130
Case study
, 129
arts-based approach
, 129
childhood disability and mental health
, 19–21
community psychology
, 18–19
developmental psychology
, 16–18
Service Learning Project in Flensburg, Germany
, 103–108
Center for Community Engagement and Work Integrated Learning
, 124
Childhood disability
, 19–21
Civic-social competences
, 77–78, 82
Civil society
, 104, 106, 112
Co-created partnerships
, 157
Co-development
of class
, 37
by community partners and students
, 42
Collaboration readiness questions
, 154
Collaborative service-learning
art station
, 125–126
background and development of program
, 123–125
challenges experienced by stakeholders
, 131–132
community engagement
, 120–121
conceptual framework
, 121–123
findings
, 130
Human Movement station
, 126–127
methodology
, 129–130
reading station
, 127–128
value of day
, 130–131
wellness station
, 129
writing literacy
, 128–129
Collaborative work
, 16, 81–82
Communication campaigns
, 108
Communities of practice
, 158
Community Based Participatory Research
, 129–130
Community engagement (CE)
, 4, 12, 120–121, 151–152
Covid-19 in South Africa
, 87–89
developments in community engagement theory and practice
, 152–153
findings
, 156
findings
, 90–95
focus groups
, 155
institutional assessment of community
, 163–165
institutional supports and barriers
, 159–163
investigating Acadia’s community engagement capacity
, 155–156
limitations
, 95
methodology
, 90, 154
power and positionality of university
, 156–159
program framework for CE day
, 122
reciprocity and mutual benefit in literature
, 153–154
reflection assignments
, 86–87
and social perspectives
, 48
in South Africa
, 87
Community First: Impacts of Community Engagement (CFICE)
, 153
Community health promotion
, 136
Community Impact Scale
, 153, 165
Community partnerships
, 136
Community psychology
, 18–19
Community-based Project
, 86
Community-based service learning (CBSL)
, 5, 12–13
childhood disability and mental health
, 19–21
community psychology
, 18–19
developmental psychology
, 16–18
engagements
, 22
findings
, 15
investment in
, 21–22
methodology
, 14–15
psychological assistance
, 23
relevant literature
, 13–14
Community-university partnerships (CUPs)
, 151–152
Conference of Rectors of Spanish Universities (CRUE)
, 62
Conscientizacion
, 156–157
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
, 51
Continuous design thinking process
, 109
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
, 87
in South Africa
, 87–89
Critical consciousness
, 14, 22
Critical reflection
, 4, 30, 41
Critical-service-learning
, 29
carefully curate readings and other media to represents multiple viewpoints
, 37–38
challenges to implementing service-learning pedagogies
, 28–29
creating final product co-developed by community partners and students
, 42
DEAL model to assess student learning and community partner outcomes
, 41–42
design assignments to reinforce critical-service learning goals
, 38–40
design course assignments and LOs to explicitly tie service learning
, 34–36
design critical-service-learning experience
, 40–41
engage long-term partners regularly through codevelopment of course outcomes
, 36–37
experience
, 37
Food Systems and Metabolic Rift course
, 33–34
framework in action
, 33
proposed framework for
, 30–33
Cross-faculty service-learning project
, 120
Cultural activities
, 142–144
Culture
, 106, 123, 136, 146, 147, 153, 160, 164
Scholarly identity mapping
, 35
Self-assessment questionnaires
, 77
Self-interested partnerships
, 158
Semi-structured interviews
, 77–78
Service
initiative
, 140–142
reflection on
, 140
Service learning initiative
, 138
general information
, 138–139
pre-travel preparation
, 139
travel
, 139–140
Service learning pedagogy
, 138
Service Learning Portfolio
, 40
Service Learning Project (SLP)
, 100
A Bus for the Refugee Aid
, 106–107
A Short Film and Poster Competition Against Violence in the Family
, 107–108
A Street Soccer Field for an Out-of-School Learning Site
, 107
assignment
, 104–105
course structure and schedule
, 105–106
in Flensburg, Germany
, 103
further projects
, 108
lighthouse projects
, 106
new bonus partners for volunteer card
, 108
service learning goals
, 103–104
Service-learning (SL)
, 4, 13, 14, 28–29, 48, 62, 121, 123
impact of
, 55–56
academic achievement
, 49–50
benefits to older adults
, 54–55
benefits to students
, 52–53
community engagement and social perspectives
, 48
desire to engage more with older adults
, 53
desire to learn more about older adults
, 53
findings
, 52
methods
, 51
older adult participants
, 51
personal and professional development
, 48–49
service learning with older adults
, 50
student participants
, 51–52
study context
, 51
Six Thinking Caps of De Bono
, 90
Size-dependent preconditions
, 102
Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)
, 7–8, 101
Small business management (SBM)
, 8, 100
collaboration with project partners
, 110–111
collaboration with students
, 109–110
cooperation and support
, 111–112
core principles of teaching management at EUF
, 100–101
preparation and (content-related)implementation of seminar
, 109
rounds of service learning
, 108
Service Learning Project in Flensburg, Germany
, 103–108
social realities of small businesses as subject of practical SBM teaching
, 101–103
teaching “small business management” at EUF
, 100
Smaller non-profit organizations
, 103
Social connections
, 6, 52, 54–56
Social responsibility
, 101
Socially integrative coordination mechanisms
, 102
South Africa (SA)
, 12, 120, 121
HEIs in
, 123
Spanish Universities, SL experiences in
, 63
benefits
, 81–82
data collection process and data items
, 66–67
data on studies included in review
, 69–73
distribution of experiences by geographic area
, 75
eligibility criteria
, 65–66
environment targeted by ApS service
, 76
experiences in the field of education
, 68
implementation of SL experiences
, 80–81
information sources, search and study selection
, 66
methodology
, 63
participation in SL experiences
, 78–79
planned methods of analysis
, 68
protocol and registration
, 63–65
risk of bias in individual studies
, 67–68
semi-structured interviews
, 77–78
word cloud with titles of analyzed articles
, 74
Spread your wings
, 121, 124, 125, 128
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats analysis (SWOT analysis)
, 40
Student engagement
, 5, 12, 30
Student learning outcomes
, 28
Student participants
, 51–52
Student-centric approach
, 29
Student-centric service-learning model
, 30
Sustainable Development Goal (SDG)
, 120
SDG 3
, 123
Systematic review
, 63–64
eligibility criteria
, 65–66
qualitative
, 6
Systemic oppressions
, 158