A proposed explanation for why business creation is often found to increase in recessions is that there are two components to entrepreneurship – “opportunity” and “necessity” – the latter of which is mostly counter-cyclical. Although there is some agreement on the conceptual distinction between these two factors driving entrepreneurship, there is little consensus in the literature on empirical definitions. The goal of this chapter is to propose an operational definition of opportunity versus necessity entrepreneurship based on the entrepreneur's prior work status (i.e., based on previous unemployment) that is straightforward, based on objective information, and empirically feasible using many large, nationally representative datasets. We then explore the validity of the definitions with theory and empirical evidence. Using datasets from the United States and Germany, we find that 80–90% of entrepreneurs are opportunity entrepreneurs. Applying our proposed definitions, we document that opportunity entrepreneurship is generally pro-cyclical and necessity entrepreneurship is strongly counter-cyclical both at the national levels and across local economic conditions. We also find that opportunity vs necessity entrepreneurship is associated with the creation of more growth-oriented businesses. The operational definitions of opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship proposed here may be useful for distinguishing between the two types of entrepreneurship in future research.
We thank Marco Caliendo, Emilio Congregado, Marie Mora, Jeremy Moulton, Barbara Robles, Herbert J. Schuetze, André van Stel, Ting Zhang, and participants at the 2017 ASSA/AEA Annual Meeting in Chicago, IL, for helpful comments and suggestions. Fairlie also thanks Stanford University (SIEPR) for support as a visiting scholar while working on the project.
Fairlie, R.W. and Fossen, F.M. (2020), "Defining Opportunity versus Necessity Entrepreneurship: Two Components of Business Creation", Polachek, S.W. and Tatsiramos, K. (Ed.) Change at Home, in the Labor Market, and On the Job (Research in Labor Economics, Vol. 48), Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 253-289. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0147-912120200000048008
Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2021 Emerald Publishing Limited