To read this content please select one of the options below:

The impact of CEO narcissism and optimism on capital structure under pandemic conditions

Elena Fedorova (Department of Corporate Finance and Corporate Governance, Financial University, Moscow, Russian Federation)
Alexandr Nevredinov (Department of Engineering Business and Management, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, Russian Federation)
Pavel Drogovoz (Department of Engineering Business and Management, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, Russian Federation)

Review of Behavioral Finance

ISSN: 1940-5979

Article publication date: 5 February 2024

83

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of our study is to study the impact of chief executive officer (CEO) optimism and narcissism on the company's capital structure.

Design/methodology/approach

(1) The authors opt for regression, machine learning and text analysis to explore the impact of narcissism and optimism on the capital structure. (2) We analyze CEO interviews and employ three methods to evaluate narcissism: the dictionary proposed by Anglin, which enabled us to assess the following components: authority, superiority, vanity and exhibitionism; count of first-person singular and plural pronouns and count of CEO photos displayed. Following this approach, we were able to make a more thorough assessment of corporate narcissism. (3) Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) technique helped to find the differences in the corporate rhetoric of narcissistic and non-narcissistic CEOs and to find differences between the topics of interviews and letters provided by narcissistic and non-narcissistic CEOs.

Findings

Our research demonstrates that narcissism has a slight and nonlinear impact on capital structure. However, our findings suggest that there is an impact of pessimism and uncertainty under pandemic conditions when managers predicted doom and completely changed their strategies. We applied various approaches to estimate the gender distribution of CEOs and found that the median values of optimism and narcissism do not depend on sex. Using LDA, we examined the content and key topics of CEO interviews, defined as positive and negative. There are some differences in the topics: narcissistic CEOs are more likely to speak about long-term goals, projects and problems; they often talk about their brand and business processes.

Originality/value

First, we examine the COVID-19 pandemic period and evaluate how CEO optimism and pessimism affect their financial decisions under specific external conditions. The pandemic forced companies to shift the way they worked: either to switch to the remote work model or to interrupt operations; to lose or, on the contrary, attract clients. In addition, during this period, corporate management can have a different outlook on their company’s financial performance and goals. The LDA technique helped to find the differences in the corporate rhetoric of narcissistic and non-narcissistic CEOs. Second, we use three methods to evaluate narcissism. Third, the research is based on a set of advanced methods: machine learning techniques (random forest to reveal a nonlinear impact of CEO optimism and narcissism on capital structure).

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Lyudmila Vinogradova for her translation and proofreading of this article.

Citation

Fedorova, E., Nevredinov, A. and Drogovoz, P. (2024), "The impact of CEO narcissism and optimism on capital structure under pandemic conditions", Review of Behavioral Finance, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/RBF-04-2023-0087

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles