To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below:

Intent vs. action: talented employees and leadership development

Violetta Khoreva (Management and Organization, Hanken School of Economics, Vaasa, Finland)
Vlad Vaiman (School of Management, California Lutheran University, Thousand Oaks, California, USA)

Personnel Review

ISSN: 0048-3486

Article publication date: 2 March 2015

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the responses of employees, who are identified as talents by their multinational enterprises, in regards to leadership development activities. By applying social exchange and expectancy theories, the authors examine the association between talent identification, perceived effectiveness of leadership development activities, willingness to participate in those activities and actual participation in them.

Design/methodology/approach

The data were collected through a web-based questionnaire entitled “Leadership2020 Talent Survey”. Eight multinational enterprises joined the survey and delivered a sample based on the target group definition.

Findings

The analysis shows that perceived effectiveness of leadership development activities is positively associated with willingness of employees to undertake those activities. The results also reveal that there is no significant association between the employees’ willingness to participate in leadership development activities and their actual participation in those activities.

Research limitations/implications

Given its cross-sectional nature, the authors cannot completely exclude the possibility of common method bias having impact on the results of this study. The authors thus call for longitudinal research to examine the nature of causality within the relationships analyzed in this study.

Practical implications

Managers and practitioners should keep in mind that willingness to participate in leadership development activities does not always result in actual participation of employees in those activities. Symbolic representations may be very different from representations in real-life situations. Investigations that rely on the willingness as a proxy for actual behaviour must thus be interpreted with caution.

Originality/value

The authors found that employees often fail to act in accordance with their stated eagerness. According to the findings, there is a clear discrepancy between expressed willingness to implement certain behaviour and its actual implementation. This study poses a strong bias in overestimating the likelihood that an employee will engage in a desirable behaviour based on his/her willingness to do so.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Hanken & Stockholm School of Economics Executive Education, and particularly to Dr Sari Salojärvi for providing the data for this research, and to the Foundation for Economic Education (Liikesivistysrahasto) (Dec. no 2-926-24) for financing this research.

Citation

Khoreva, V. and Vaiman, V. (2015), "Intent vs. action: talented employees and leadership development", Personnel Review, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 200-216. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-10-2013-0191

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2015, Emerald Group Publishing Limited