To read this content please select one of the options below:

The relationship between dietary polyamine levels, metabolic risk parameters and anthropometric measurements in postmenopausal women

Kevser Tari Selcuk (Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Bandirma Onyedi Eylul University, Balikesir, Turkiye)
Ramazan Mert Atan (Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Bandirma Onyedi Eylul University, Balikesir, Turkiye)
Sedat Arslan (Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Bandirma Onyedi Eylul University, Balikesir, Turkiye)
Nursel Dal (Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Bandirma Onyedi Eylul University, Balikesir, Turkiye)
Kezban Sahin (Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Bandirma Onyedi Eylul University, Balikesir, Turkiye)

Nutrition & Food Science

ISSN: 0034-6659

Article publication date: 9 January 2024

Issue publication date: 21 February 2024

37

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to investigate the relationship between dietary polyamine levels, metabolic risk parameters and anthropometric measurements in postmenopausal women.

Design/methodology/approach

This cross-sectional study was conducted with 562 45–64-year-old postmenopausal women who presented to a Family Health Center. To collect the data, the Descriptive Information Form and Food Frequency Questionnaire were used. In the data analysis, numbers, percentages, mean, standard deviation and multiple linear regression analysis were used.

Findings

The multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that dietary putrescine intake was negatively associated with systolic blood pressure (ß = −0.179, p < 0.001), dietary spermidine intake was positively associated with waist circumference (WC) (ß = 0.142, p = 0.013), systolic blood pressure (ß = 0.188, p = 0.001), diastolic blood pressure (ß = 0.218, p < 0.001), body mass index (BMI) (ß = 0.169, p = 0.003) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) (ß = 0.156, p = 0.006), and dietary spermine intake was negatively associated with WC (ß = −0.158, p = 0.003), systolic blood pressure (ß = −0.195, p < 0.001), BMI (ß = −0.107, p = 0.042) and WHtR (ß = −0.138, p = 0.009).

Research limitations/implications

Owing to the study’s cross-sectional nature, the lack of succession in the cause–effect relationship, the use of self-report Food Frequency Questionnaire to determine dietary polyamine intake and the inability to analyze seasonal differences are among the limitations of the study.

Originality/value

In this study, an association was determined between dietary polyamines, metabolic risk parameters and anthropometric measurements. The findings suggest that dietary polyamines in human health should be further investigated owing to the increasing metabolic risk parameters.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Funding: The authors declare that they did not receive any financial support from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflicts of interest statement: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Author contributions: Kevser Tari Selcuk, Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – Review and Editing, Project administration. Ramazan Mert Atan, Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – Original Draft. Sedat Arslan, Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – Review and Editing. Nursel Dal, Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – Review and Editing. Kezban Sahin, Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – Review and Editing.

Data availability: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Kevser Tari Selcuk upon reasonable request.

Citation

Tari Selcuk, K., Atan, R.M., Arslan, S., Dal, N. and Sahin, K. (2024), "The relationship between dietary polyamine levels, metabolic risk parameters and anthropometric measurements in postmenopausal women", Nutrition & Food Science, Vol. 54 No. 2, pp. 334-348. https://doi.org/10.1108/NFS-11-2023-0248

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles