Two narratives: recovery journeys in mental health

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to compare lived recovery journeys in mental health with recovery models.

Design/methodology/approach

Unstructured interviews with prompts were conducted with two individuals.

Findings

Some recovery models correspond in part with the live experience of subjects. These narratives have personal emphasis that is incongruent with the highlighted models. In particular, the subjects have a place for therapeutic interventions, i.e. talking therapies and medication.

Research limitations/implications

The live experience of the two people with mental health issues crosses boundaries of recovery models. Relevant models include those used in peer support; however, they too do not fit exactly with the detailed journeys.

Practical implications

A varied approach without preconceptions is appropriate to understand the components of these two recovery journeys.

Social implications

The medical model approach to mental health is not discounted rather it is integral to these two recovery journeys.

Originality/value

This is qualitative research using stated models of mental health recovery. In addition to the principles of hope, meaning, connectedness, identity and empowerment, the two subjects include the essential part for medication and talking therapies in their recovery.

Citation

Voyce, A. (2020), "Two narratives: recovery journeys in mental health", Mental Health and Social Inclusion, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 105-110. https://doi.org/10.1108/MHSI-03-2020-0011