To read this content please select one of the options below:

The neurophysiological basis of leadership: a machine learning approach

Elena Parra Vargas (Laboratory of Immersive Neurotechnologies, Polytechnic University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain)
Jestine Philip (Pompea College of Business, University of New Haven, West Haven, Connecticut, USA)
Lucia A. Carrasco-Ribelles (Laboratory of Immersive Neurotechnologies, Polytechnic University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain)
Irene Alice Chicchi Giglioli (Laboratory of Immersive Neurotechnologies, Polytechnic University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain)
Gaetano Valenza (Department of Information Engineering and Bioengineering and Robotics Research Centre E Piaggio, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy)
Javier Marín-Morales (Laboratory of Immersive Neurotechnologies, Polytechnic University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain)
Mariano Alcañiz Raya (Laboratory of Immersive Neurotechnologies, Polytechnic University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain)

Management Decision

ISSN: 0025-1747

Article publication date: 11 April 2023

Issue publication date: 22 May 2023

383

Abstract

Purpose

This research employed two neurophysiological techniques (electroencephalograms (EEG) and galvanic skin response (GSR)) and machine learning algorithms to capture and analyze relationship-oriented leadership (ROL) and task-oriented leadership (TOL). By grounding the study in the theoretical perspectives of transformational leadership and embodied leadership, the study draws connections to the human body's role in activating ROL and TOL styles.

Design/methodology/approach

EEG and GSR signals were recorded during resting state and event-related brain activity for 52 study participants. Both leadership styles were assessed independently using a standard questionnaire, and brain activity was captured by presenting subjects with emotional stimuli.

Findings

ROL revealed differences in EEG baseline over the frontal lobes during emotional stimuli, but no differences were found in GSR signals. TOL style, on the other hand, did not present significant differences in either EEG or GSR responses, as no biomarkers showed differences. Hence, it was concluded that EEG measures were better at recognizing brain activity associated with ROL than TOL. EEG signals were also strongest when individuals were presented with stimuli containing positive (specifically, happy) emotional content. A subsequent machine learning model developed using EEG and GSR data to recognize high/low levels of ROL and TOL predicted ROL with 81% accuracy.

Originality/value

The current research integrates psychophysiological techniques like EEG with machine learning to capture and analyze study variables. In doing so, the study addresses biases associated with self-reported surveys that are conventionally used in management research. This rigorous and interdisciplinary research advances leadership literature by striking a balance between neurological data and the theoretical underpinnings of transformational and embodied leadership.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Generalitat Valenciana funded project “Mixed reality and brain decision (REBRAND)” 502 (PROMETEO/2019/105).

Jestine Philip – Equal authorship with first author

Citation

Parra Vargas, E., Philip, J., Carrasco-Ribelles, L.A., Alice Chicchi Giglioli, I., Valenza, G., Marín-Morales, J. and Alcañiz Raya, M. (2023), "The neurophysiological basis of leadership: a machine learning approach", Management Decision, Vol. 61 No. 6, pp. 1465-1484. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2022-0208

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles