To read this content please select one of the options below:

Internal audit function, board quality and financial reporting quality: evidence from Malaysia

Shireenjit K. Johl (Accounting, Economics and Finance, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia)
Satirenjit Kaur Johl (School of Management and Humanities, University Teknologi PETRONAS, Tronoh, Malaysia)
Nava Subramaniam (School of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia)
Barry Cooper (School of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia)

Managerial Auditing Journal

ISSN: 0268-6902

Article publication date: 7 October 2013

8640

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to test the impact of the internal audit function (IAF), an increasingly common internal governance mechanism, on a firm's financial reporting quality. Specifically, this paper investigates the association between the quality of the IAF and abnormal accruals (as a proxy for financial reporting quality) and whether the board of directors play a role in moderating the relationship.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper uses a unique dataset of survey responses and archival data. Regression analysis was used to test their hypotheses.

Findings

Although their initial findings show an unexpected positive relationship between internal audit quality and abnormal accruals, this relationship is contingent on whether firms outsource their internal audit activities and/or whether they are politically linked. In estimations excluding outsourcing and political connections observations, this paper shows that the association between internal audit quality and abnormal accruals is negative and in particular internal audit organisational independence, financial focus audit activities and investment are associated with lower income-increasing (opportunistic) abnormal accruals. Next, when this paper interact board quality with internal audit quality, this paper finds although the lower ordered variables board quality and internal audit quality coefficients are negatively related to abnormal accruals, the interaction variable between these two variables is positively associated with abnormal accruals, indicating the possibility of a substitution relationship between board quality and internal audit quality.

Research limitations/implications

Their findings show that certain internal audit attributes play an important role in the financial reporting process and thus these findings are expected to inform the Institute of Internal Auditors and other regulatory bodies on the role of internal audit (being an important internal governance mechanism) in financial reporting, which in turn can assist in market/regulatory reforms/changes and inform the revised Malaysian Code of Corporate Governance.

Originality/value

This paper extends prior internal auditing literature by examining the relationship between internal audit quality and financial reporting quality in the context of a developing country, namely Malaysia, and whether the board of directors moderate the examined association.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

JEL classification – M42, M41, G34The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Institute of Internal Auditors Malaysia and the Institute of Chartered Accountants Australia.

Citation

K. Johl, S., Kaur Johl, S., Subramaniam, N. and Cooper, B. (2013), "Internal audit function, board quality and financial reporting quality: evidence from Malaysia", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 28 No. 9, pp. 780-814. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-06-2013-0886

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2013, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles