Ambidextrous leadership and team innovation

Hannes Zacher (School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia)
Kathrin Rosing (Institute of Strategic Personnel Management and Institute of Corporate Development, Leuphana University, Lüneburg, Germany)

Leadership & Organization Development Journal

ISSN: 0143-7739

Publication date: 2 March 2015

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to report the first empirical test of the recently proposed ambidexterity theory of leadership for innovation (Rosing et al., 2011). This theory proposes that the interaction between two complementary leadership behaviors – opening and closing – predicts team innovation, such that team innovation is highest when both opening and closing leadership behaviors are high.

Design/methodology/approach

Multi-source survey data came from 33 team leaders of architectural and interior design firms and 90 of their employees.

Findings

Results supported the interaction hypothesis, even after controlling for leaders’ transformational leadership behavior and general team success.

Research limitations/implications

The relatively small sample size and the cross-sectional design are potential limitations of the study. The findings provide initial support for the central hypothesis of the ambidexterity theory of leadership for innovation.

Practical implications

The results suggest that organizations could train team leaders’ ambidextrous leadership behaviors to increase team innovation.

Social implications

Identifying ways to facilitate organizational innovation is important, as it contributes to employment and company growth as well as individual and societal well-being.

Originality/value

This multi-source study contributes to the literatures on leadership and innovation in organizations by showing that ambidextrous leadership behaviors predict team innovation above and beyond transformational leadership behavior.

Keywords

Citation

Zacher, H. and Rosing, K. (2015), "Ambidextrous leadership and team innovation", Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 54-68. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-11-2012-0141

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2015, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.