Future proofing of tourism entrepreneurship in Oman: challenges and prospects

Firdouse Rahman Khan (Sohar University, Sohar, Oman)
Jayashree Krishnamurthy (Oman Tourism College, Muscat, Oman)

Journal of Work-Applied Management

ISSN: 2205-2062

Article publication date: 1 March 2016




The purpose of this paper is to analyze the various factors that inhibit tourism student’s inclination toward tourism-related entrepreneurial activities in Oman.


The study was conducted with 223 students of tourism studies who were selected on simple random sampling basis and were contacted through a well-defined questionnaire.


The study reveals that the factors like non-discrimination of gender, promotion opportunities and physical working conditions play a crucial role in motivating students to take up tourism-related career. The empirical results also reveal that the high risk of accidents, non-tourism spouse preferences and Omani traditional values discourage tourism. Thus, a natural growth toward setting up of such tourism-related entrepreneurial activities is thwarted.

Research limitations/implications

The study was restricted to undergraduate students of tourism studies in and around Muscat, Oman. The study could be extended to know the insight of the personnel involved in the entire tourism sector in Oman.

Practical implications

The study demonstrates that there is a strong association between the motivating factors and the various reasons that encourage studying tourism. The main factors impeding entrepreneurship tourism are the insufficiency of capital, lack of awareness about the ongoing programmes as well as the lack of entrepreneurial skills.

Social implications

There exists necessity for the government and the related sponsoring institutions to create an ecosystem that facilitates and encourages tourism entrepreneurs. This will in turn help in the process of diversifying Oman’s future economy toward tourism.


Very few studies have examined the entrepreneurship tourism in Oman for sustainable development, and it is a first-hand study of its kind.



Khan, F.R. and Krishnamurthy, J. (2016), "Future proofing of tourism entrepreneurship in Oman: challenges and prospects", Journal of Work-Applied Management, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 79-94. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-06-2016-0008



Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Firdouse Rahman Khan and Jayashree Krishnamurthy


Published in the Journal of Work-Applied Management. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode


The Sultanate of Oman is one of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries in the Middle East whose economic growth is steady and progressive. It is a predominantly oil-based economy. But the distant threat that Oman will run out of its oil resources in less than 20 years has stimulated the government to diversify its economy (Al Shanfari, 2012). Official statistics shows that the oil production, which was 960,000 barrels a day, reduced to 800,000 barrels a day in 2010 (Middle East Economic Review, 2010). In fact, all the GCC states are striving toward economic diversification through various projects and investments. As pointed out by Cook and Nielson (2011), Oman is building its service and tourism industry. His Majesty Sultan Qaboos during his 29th National Day address emphasized that the tourism industry is well capable of serving the aims of regional development, since its benefits will cover all regions. On the 38th National Day of Oman, His Majesty once again reaffirmed the necessity to give tourism priority. He stated that it is well qualified to offer career opportunities to Omanis (Al Balushi, 2014).

Globally, the tourism industry is estimated to have directly supported 100,894,000 jobs in 2013. It resulted to a direct contribution of USD2,155.4 billion (2.9 percent of total gross domestic product), while its total contribution to global GDP was estimated at USD6,990.3 billion in 2013 (World Travel and Tourism Council (WTTC), 2014). It is estimated that this figure will grow to 126,257,000 jobs or 3.5 percent of total employment by 2024. This is the reason why most of the countries have started to view tourism industry as a viable and sustainable alternative one to fuel their economies (WTTC, 2014). The Sultanate of Oman is no exception. It has started implementing policies to help divert its oil-based economy toward tourism as a part of its “Vision 2040.” Vision 2040 is essentially an updated version of Vision 2020 which was first drafted on the same lines. It aims at providing suitable conditions for economic diversification by increasing the non-oil production in the country (Ministry of National Economy, 1995). This includes a plan to make tourism the next main source of income for Oman after oil and gas. The mission statement clearly states that tourism will help to facilitate economic diversification, preservation of cultural integrity and environmental protection of the Sultanate of Oman (Ministry of Tourism, 2015). In Oman, though the government set aside RO298 million for the development of human resources for all the industries, including the tourism industry, the localization drive has met with limited success. This may be attributed to gaps such as lack of interest in joining the hospitality sector, lack of skills in general and specifically with regards to language and tour guiding (Times of Oman, 2014).

The government has recognized the gaps and is trying to train and educate more Omani nationals, thus, trying to prepare them for taking up employment in the tourism and hospitality sector (Bontenbal and Aziz, 2013). The Omanization criteria in the tourism sector has been set in the tourism and hospitality sector since 2003 vide ministerial decree No. 165/2003. This decree laid out the percentages of direct Omani employment to be achieved by the country’s tourism industry by 2007, namely, 83 percent in airlines, 100 percent in tourist restaurants, 80 percent in travel agents and 75 percent in 3/4/5 star hotels (Ministry of Manpower, 2003). Omanization means employing citizens of Oman. Despite strong government backing, the target is yet to be reached. Table I shows the prevailing status of workforce employed in tourism sector.

The government has also undertaken other reforms in order to improve and facilitate foreign investments in the tourism industry. With the induction of the country into the World Trade Organization in the year 2000, Oman’s strategy of promoting tourism industry to enhance private sector participation has been successful. With this, the country’s other objectives like including remote areas within this development as well as increasing employment opportunities for its citizens became easily achievable.

In the Eighth Year Plan (2011-2015), the government had allocated a huge amount for the development of tourism infrastructure. It spent RO2,084 million for airport and port construction and RO1,233 million for development and expansion. RO503 million was allocated for road improvement and development. In addition, sanctions were given for the construction of additional 3,000 hotel rooms by the end of 2014.

All these investments saw a positive effect on the tourist arrival leading to an increase in tourism revenue for the country. As per the WTTC (2014) statistics, Oman’s travel and tourism industry made a direct contribution of 3 percent to the GDP (RO982.8 million). This is expected to grow by 5.4 percent per annum, leading to an overall contribution of 3.9 percent (RO1,834.2 Million) by 2024. The employment generated by this industry was at 3.3 percent of the total employment in the country, which accounted for 37,000 jobs. This is expected to increase to 60,000 jobs by 2024. This means that the Omanization targets could easily be met.

Review of literature

It is argued that a country’s development and economic growth can be achieved by promotion of enterprise among students – a trait which requires knowledge of entrepreneurship, financial resources and favourable business environment (Milius and Sarkiene, 2008). With more tourism and hospitality projects being undertaken in both the cities and the rural areas, there is a lot of potential for starting up small and medium enterprises (SMEs) which cater to the burgeoning tourism sector. Given the fact that tourism has huge potential to create employment and entrepreneurial opportunities, development of tourism becomes vital for Oman’s economic development (Sokhalingam et al., 2013). According to Kirby (2004), entrepreneurial activity should not be seen only as a creation of new small firms but as something which operates much more broadly in all sectors of the economy. Entrepreneurship is the product of a belief of a potential entrepreneur and his/her ability to activate and undertake this belief (Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM), 2009). Entrepreneurship toward tourism sector nowadays called entrepreneurship tourism is a welcome approach that caters to the needs of the growing tourism industry. Tourism is one of the economic sectors in which a great degree of involvement is needed by the entrepreneurial community (Chilembwe and Gondwe, 2013). There are many factors that lead to entrepreneurial development, but “viable” and “profitable” opportunity is seen as a prime factor for breeding prospective entrepreneurs (Burrow et al., 2008). Additionally, according to Ryan et al. (2012), entrepreneurs play an important role in tourism development due to shared culture for tourism. This in turn can lead to success in tourism development. They refer to the claim made by Koh and Hatten (2002) that a community’s quantity and quality of supply of entrepreneurs significantly determines the magnitude and form of its touristscape. The argument being that a tourism entrepreneur is the persona causa of tourism development. In fact, they even believe that a well-endowed tourism industry would never evolve successfully without tourism entrepreneurs. According to Hvidt (2013), Oman like its GCC counterparts is striving to steer its citizens (both men and women) by educating and preparing them to compete for jobs in the private and public sectors. The tourism sector has a wide of range of jobs, including travel agencies, tour operations, accommodation facilitations, catering services, transportation, etc. Yet it is observed that Omani students are not keen in taking up profession in the tourism and hospitality industry even though there is very good scope and enormous job opportunities in tourism sector. Even the parents of the students, especially those coming from a semi-traditional context believe that the jobs in this industry is “servitude” by nature and have little prospects of promotion from rank and life (Pang, 2010). The perception is driven by the fact that the tourism employees are often seen as being uneducated, unmotivated, untrained, unskilled and unproductive (Pizam, 1982). This is confirmed by O’Mahony and Sillitoe (2001) that many positions within the tourism industry need only little experience and low skills. Even according to Roney and Oztin (2007), though the tourism industry is credited with employment generation, the jobs themselves were low paid and mostly needed low skills. In order to understand this, Kusluvan (2003) deems it important to understand it from the perspective of tourism students who are currently undertaking their course or those who have recently graduated. Casado (1992) found that the basic expectations of these students to be “fairly realistic” before their graduation period. But as they progressed into their degree course, the students’ perceptions of the industry deteriorate (Jenkins, 2001). Thus, it is argued that commitment to tourism and hospitality industry will be affected by the fact that the future potential employees have a negative image of working in the industry (Aksu and Koksal, 2005). The same was confirmed by Richardson and Anthony (2009) when their study showed that Australian students studying tourism and hospitality studies believed that the industry does not offer them the attributes necessary to make it attractive as a future career. It seems students did not consider starting their own business in tourism as a career option.

For a country like Oman where 78.4 percent of the population falls under the age of 35 years and the unemployment rate is estimated to be 15 percent, the focus on employment creation becomes crucial (Ennis, 2015). This is a tough job considering the fact that there are nearly 50,000 graduates entering the mainstream every year. Thus, encouraging entrepreneurial activity is the only option to create employment opportunities. But no amount of planning will help if there is no willpower among the students to become self-employed (Ennis, 2015). Omani society has always claimed to have thrived on the spirit of entrepreneurship, but things have changed in the recent years. An academic survey by the Sultan Qaboos University confirmed the fact that the spirit of entrepreneurship has been replaced by a notion of entitlement. “Entitlement culture” means how people are constantly looking for government help. This mind set directly affects the entrepreneurship spirit. Many feel starting up an enterprise is a hard work, but to be fair, this is a trend that can be seen elsewhere too. It can be observed how America which was once famous for its innovative and creative entrepreneurs is also becoming a victim of entitlement culture (Tarkenton, 2012). On the above lines, though various government-sponsored schemes and supporting programmes are available to the budding Omani entrepreneurs, only a handful of attempts have been made in tourism entrepreneurship. This may also be blamed on factors like shortage of “role models,” lack of proper training, unrealistic goal setting, and lack of planning skills and experience (Parambi, 2014). Another factor for taking up jobs in place of setting up a business is “Mahar” (dowry) system in the Omani society (boys have to pay money to their bride). Starting a business means there may be a lack of regular flow of money making it difficult to save for their marriage.

Though various researches have been carried out to find out the reasons for turn away from the industry, the root cause of the problem remains unsolved. In the recent past, colleges from tourism and hospitality studies in Oman have been facing many dropouts in the courses offered by them which is trivial from the statistical bulletin of Oman. Therefore, this research focuses on the study of the students’ perception and the impediments toward setting up of entrepreneurial units in tourism.

Research methodology

The survey was conducted among the students from various colleges offering tourism and hospitality management studies in Oman (namely, Oman Tourism College, German University of Technology and Gulf College). The students studying in these colleges came from various regions of Oman. Only students who had registered for graduate studies were taken into consideration. The samples were selected on simple random sampling basis, and 223 questionnaires were distributed. To confirm accuracy, the questionnaires were personally handed over to the students, and unbiased responses were collected. The respondents were also aptly assisted by way of translation and supplementation wherever required.

Data analyses and findings

From Table II the demographic details of the respondents are observed.

It is evident from Tables III-IV that the p value is less than 0.05, which means, the null hypothesis is rejected, i.e., there is a significant relationship between gender and the hometown. Therefore, the claim that the hometown from where the respondent hails influences the gender effectiveness on becoming tourism students is proved positively. In other words, it is found that the majority of the students joining tourism studies were female students hailing from city and urban areas. The students from rural areas are reluctant to join tourism studies.

It is evident from Table V that p value is less than 0.05. Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected at 5 percent level of significance, i.e., it connotes that there is a significant relationship between the statements pertaining to the reason for selecting tourism and hospitality course and the choices of the respondents. Thus, the assertion that “the issues (statements) play a dominant role in affecting the selection of tourism and hospitality course” is proved positively. Furthermore, it is evident from the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test values that “a future career in tourism” was ranked first among the factors followed by the factors “getting a scholarship” and “the only major I was offered.”

It is evident from Table VI that p value is less than 0.05. Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected at 5 percent level of significance, i.e., it connotes that there is a significant relationship between the statements pertaining to personality traits and the choices of the respondents. Thus, the assertion that “statements play a dominant role in affecting the personality traits” is proved positively. Furthermore, it can be seen from the K-S test ranking in the above table that the respondents believe the prime personality trait toward tourism is “like to meet people” followed by “like to work with people with different culture” followed by “like to travel” (Table VII).

K-S test value is 1.1067 which clearly shows that there is a significant relationship between rank factors and factors involved in selecting a job. It can be seen from the K-S test ranking in the above table that the respondents believe the prime reason for selecting a tourism job is “good starting salary” followed by “a society-respected job” followed by “a job acceptable by family.”

It is evident from Table VIII that p value is less than 0.05. Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected at 5 percent level of significance, i.e., it connotes that there is a significant relationship between the statements pertaining to the motivating factors and the choices of the respondents. Thus, the assertion that “the motivating factors (statements) play a dominant role in affecting the selection of tourism and hospitality course” is proved positively. Furthermore, it is evident from the K-S test values that “no sex discrimination in the tourism industry” was ranked first among the factors followed by the factors “good physical working conditions” and “there is always something new to learn in this tourism job.”

In other words, “no discrimination of sex in the tourism sector” was the prime reason due to which more female students were joining/willing to join tourism studies.

It is evident from Table IX that p value is less than 0.05. Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected at 5 percent level of significance, i.e., it connotes that there is a significant relationship between the statements pertaining to the reason for not joining the tourism and hospitality courses and the choices of the respondents. Thus, the assertion that “the issues (statements) play a dominant role in influencing the non-selection of tourism and hospitality course” is proved positively. Furthermore, it is evident from the K-S test values that “high risk of accidents in the tourism industry” was ranked first among the factors followed by the factors “Omanis do not prefer to marry a boy/girl from tourism industry” and “no job security.”

Even Omani parents are not interested to get their wards married to a person employed directly in the tourism sector.

It is evident from Table X that p value is less than 0.05. Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected at 5 percent level of significance, i.e., it connotes that there is a significant relationship between the statements pertaining to the reason for discouraging tourism to start your own tourism business and the choices of the respondents. Thus, the claimed assertion that “the issues (statements) play a dominant role in discouraging to start your own businesses” is proved positively. Furthermore, it is evident from the K-S test values that “interested in government jobs” was ranked first among the factors followed by the factors “not sufficient entrepreneurial skills” and “insufficiency of capital.”

From Table XI the obtained linear regression is V2=27.936+0.114 V1, where V1 is the motivating factors and V2 is the reason for selecting tourism studies. It can be seen from the above that variable V1 has an impact on the reasons for students’ selecting tourism studies.


Among the respondents, 84.8 percent of them have joined the tourism courses on their own interest. Females are the majority of the students (95 percent) motivated toward joining tourism studies. It can be observed that most of the tourism students are from Muscat followed by those from Sohar. According to the ranking by the respondents, among the reasons for selecting tourism studies, “a future career in tourism” ranked first followed by the factors “getting a scholarship” and “the only major I was offered.” The personality trait toward tourism is “like to meet people” followed by “like to work with people with different culture” and “like to travel.” The prime reason for selecting a tourism job is “good starting salary” followed by “a society-respected job” and “a job acceptable by family”. The main motivating factor affecting the students toward selecting tourism course is “no sex discrimination in the tourism industry” – this is the prime reason due to which more female students from the city and urban areas were joining/willing to join tourism studies.

The factors for the non-selection of tourism and hospitality course are “high risk of accidents in the tourism industry” followed by the factors “Omanis do not prefer to marry a boy/girl from tourism industry” and “no job security.” Among the various courses available, majority of the respondents (87.4 percent) preferred to study tourism management as their major course of study, and the majority of the students (69.5 percent) join tourism studies on the ministerial scholarship and only 23 percent of the respondents spend their own funds to join the tourism studies. It is clearly observed that 66.8 percent of the respondents are not aware of the different career paths available in tourism, and 76 percent of the respondents are unaware of the recent developments taking place in the tourism sector. Moreover, 87.9 percent of the respondents are unaware of the tourism promotions and campaigns by the government. Furthermore, 73.1 percent are unaware of the job vacancies in tourism, and 93.7 percent of the respondents have never even applied for jobs based on the advertisements. It can be observed that only 33.2 percent of the respondents have shown interest to venture into entrepreneurial tourism, i.e., to start their own tourism business, and the reasons for discouraging students to start your own business is “interest in government jobs” followed by the factors “not sufficient entrepreneurial skills” and “insufficiency of capital.”

Furthermore, ANOVA test results shows that there is a strong association between the motivating factors and the reasons for students choosing tourism as their studies, whereas the personality traits do not have any impact on the selection.

Conclusion, discussion and managerial implications

It is clear from the above that interest in tourism studies did not seem to sustain and motivate the students to take up tourism as a career. Similarly, starting a tourism business is also not an option for the students. The main impediments seem to be society and cultural pressures. Also, the spirit of tourism entrepreneurship is subdued by perceptions that they are not equipped with enough knowledge and capital. This lack of awareness of the career path within tourism and the government steps to promote it as the next big industry only adds to the above impediments. According to Rampton (2014) entrepreneur must have five striking personality traits, which include passion, resilience, a strong sense of “self,” flexibility and vision. But the passion declines gradually and risk aversion is developed. In spite of tremendous supporting programmes offered by Omani governmental organizations and other institutions, such as Sanad, Intilaaqah, Jusoor, etc., in the development and promotion of entrepreneurship and tourism, the number of SMEs emerging in this sector is very limited. Omani students prefer to work in time-specific, sophisticated white collar jobs. They are not prepared to take risk in venturing into tourism sector. In fact, the dropout rates in tourism studies are high in the initial years in Oman. Tourism students who join initially with full zest lose their initiative just because of their lack of awareness about the future of the industry. This may be because of gaps in the way and medium of communication of the promotional campaign and initiatives by the government. This calls for an urgent relook into the targeting and delivering strategy of the campaign. Majority of the tourism sector business in Oman is controlled by non-Omani-dominated multinational companies. Thereby, there is leakage of national income from the tourism industry as well. This makes it reason enough for the sponsoring organization and the government to pay immediate attention to entrepreneurial tourism to sustain competition. There seems to be an international awareness to this (Cooper, 2015). She further added that the “fear to fail” attitude, “lack of a mature venture capital market” as well as “lack of education.” She proposed more involvement from the government, banks and other financial institutions as well as mentoring to encourage a sustained growth of tourism entrepreneurship. Gellner and Moog (2008) argued that the overall planning by the relevant authorities should be balanced in such a way that the availability of financial capital is provided to make entrepreneurship in the tourism sector more attractive (Figure 1).

As suggested in the effective forces model (given above) by Khan (2009), the tourism entrepreneurship can only be activated with the governmental assistance and the sponsoring institutions. Cultural aspects notwithstanding, tourism students are still tempted to enter the entrepreneurship because of the perception of earning appreciable profit, but financial problems seem to create hurdles resulting in operational losses and closures of their business. Many blame that the governmental financial programmes were still not available to all, and the ground reality was far different than those on paper. Policy makers should remember that while young people are more creative and innovative, they are not averse to risks, are impatient and are easily put off. Hence, the governmental as well as private financial institutes that are willing to provide financial assistance to budding entrepreneurs should make themselves more approachable with easy advance procurement procedure. There should also be plans to encourage a better venture capital mechanism in Oman. Private stakeholders should be encouraged to support the government and provide supportive assistance. This assistance may be offered in the form of training as well as consultation. Sustainable support should also be provided from as early as the business planning stage until two to three years after a business is up and running. A system of mentoring is definitely needed for new entrants through support groups. A conducive climate should be provided so that failed ventures should not be frowned at but should be supported as a learning process. Pride in self-reliance as well as in the entrepreneurial spirit should be promoted at all levels. Tourism entrepreneurs’ meets should be held on a more frequent basis with media coverage to promote the successful entrepreneurs as role models. The success of every tourism entrepreneur should be celebrated in order to breed more of them. There should be synchronization between the tourism and hospitality professional associations and the SMEs so that there is more understanding and cooperation among them. This will help the small businesses survive competition. The educational institutes that harbor the youth need to design their “tourism and hospitality” curriculum inclusive of theoretical as well as practical entrepreneurship. They should work together with all stakeholders to develop and promote entrepreneur skills among the youth so as to kindle their entrepreneur spirit. There should be proper data available and recorded so as to have a record of entrepreneurial successes and failures. This will help policy makers in making policies to prevent eroding of the entrepreneurial spirit. Youth are the future of Oman. When all the stakeholders work together to support and create an ecosystem that helps to sustain the spirit of tourism entrepreneurship, the outcome can only be positive. Policies that are based on ground realities will help in future proofing the sustainable growth of tourism in Oman.


Effective force vector model (EF model) of a successful entrepreneur

Figure 1

Effective force vector model (EF model) of a successful entrepreneur

Workforce/labor in tourism sector 2013

Omani Expatriate Total Omanization %
Airline agencies 3,152 2,163 5,315 59.30
Tourism agencies 1,265 2,312 3,577 35.36
Accommodation 2,724 6,608 9,332 29.19
Car rentals 210 124 334 62.87
Totals 7,351 11,207 18,558 39.61

Source: Al Balushi (2014)

Demographic information about the respondents

Characteristics F %
Male 95 42.6
Female 128 57.4
Ibri 6 2.7
Muscat 127 57.0
Musandam 17 7.6
Nizwa 12 5.4
Sohar 23 10.3
Salalah 5 2.2
Sur 2 0.9
Others 31 13.9
Work experience
No prior experience 182 81.6
Less than 2 years 16 7.2
2-5 years 10 4.5
More than 5 years 15 6.7
Major course of study
Tourism management 195 87.4
Hotel management 16 7.2
Event management 9 4.0
Hospitality management 1 0.4
Club management 1 0.4
Others 1 0.4
Enrollment of study
Full time 222 99.6
Part time 1 0.4
Omani 221 99.1
Non-Omanis 2 0.9
Studies discontinuity
No (first time of study) 194 87.0
One time discontinued 28 12.6
Discontinued for 2 times 1 0.4
100% by ministry 155 69.5
50-50 ministry and self 45 20.2
100% self-sponsored 23 10.3
GPA during study
1-2 27 12.1
>2-3 137 61.4
>3-4 55 24.7
>4 4 1.8
Choice of study
Yes tourism 189 84.8
No tourism 34 15.2
Different career paths in tourism
Yes (awaits) 74 33.2
No 149 66.8
Plan to start own business
Yes 83 37.2
No 140 62.8
Recent developments
Yes 53 23.8
No 170 76.2
Aware of promotion by the government
Yes 27 12.1
No 196 87.9
Job vacancies in tourism
Yes 60 26.9
No 163 73.1
Applied for job based on any advertisement
Yes 14 6.3
No 209 93.7

Source: Questionnaire

Gender vs hometown

Hometown Male Female Total
Ibri 2 4 6
Muscat 53 74 127
Musandam 14 3 17
Nizwa 3 9 12
Sohar 6 17 23
Salalah 1 4 5
Sur 0 2 2
Others 16 15 31
Total 95 128 223

χ2 tests

Value df Asymp. sig. (two-sided)
Pearson χ2 18.880 7 0.009
No. of valid cases 223

Reason for selecting tourism and hospitality course

No. Statements SD D UD A SA K-S value χ2 p value
1 A future career in tourism 6 7 18 52 140 5.392 92.686 0.000
% 2.7 3.1 8.1 23.3 62.8
2 Parents compelled me 83 51 22 33 34 3.395
% 37.2 22.9 9.9 14.8 15.2
3 Curriculum is reasonable 29 27 24 58 85 3.596
% 13.0 12.1 10.8 26.0 38.1
4 Course fee is reasonable 29 38 36 50 70 2.939
% 13.0 17.0 16.1 22.4 31.4
5 I got scholarship 19 11 43 34 116 4.567
% 8.5 4.9 19.3 15.2 52.0
6 Easy to get a job 1 2 39 80 101 4.160
% 0.4 0.9 17.5 35.9 45.3
7 Studying tourism is easier 6 26 10 66 115 4.335
% 2.7 11.7 4.5 29.6 51.6
8 The only major I was offered 8 39 7 53 116 4.475
% 3.6 17.5 3.1 23.8 52.0

Personality traits

No. Statements SD D UD A SA K-S value χ2 p value
1 Like to travel 33 23 12 58 97 3.995 144.426 0.000
% 14.8 10.3 5.4 26.0 43.5
2 Like to meet people 2 4 10 47 160 6.255
% 0.9 1.8 4.5 21.1 71.7
3 Do not mind working in shifts 10 15 28 65 105 3.954
% 4.5 6.7 12.6 29.1 47.1
4 Like to work with people with different cultures 4 32 16 44 127 4.999
% 1.8 14.3 7.2 19.7 57.0
5 Like to work abroad 28 68 25 34 68 3.365
% 12.6 30.5 11.2 15.2 30.5

Factors during the selection of a job

No. Statements Rank 1 Rank 2 Rank 3 Rank 4 Rank 5 Rank 6 Total K-S value
 1 Interesting, comfortable and enjoyable job 4 3 23 30 2.529
 2 Pleasant working condition 24 14 3 3 22 66 2.228
 3 Promotion prospects and faster career growth 2 27 41 12 46 6 134 2.710
 4 Job security 17 52 34 30 3 3 139 2.708
 5 A job acceptable by my family 2 28 4 47 28 109 3.196
 6 To use the knowledge gained from my study 4 28 32 2.942
 7 A society-respected job 4 48 11 17 80 3.297
 8 Opportunities to travel abroad 4 13 6 32 22 77 2.591
 9 Good starting salary 135 40 9 17 3 204 5.404
10 Bonus and other prerequisites 17 43 58 25 13 16 172 2.922
11 Straight working timings – no heavy workload 13 10 40 26 3 92 2.557
12 Adventurous job 17 11 18 9 19 32 106 2.060
13 International opportunities 8 15 12 3 17 23 78 2.027
14 Job contributing good to the society 9 3 9 13 34 1.557
Total 226 241 223 226 220 217 1,353

Motivating factors toward tourism jobs

No. Statements SD D UD A SA K-S value χ2 p value
1 Get chances to meet famous people during tourism job 59 54 12 60 38 3.298 154.220 0.000
% 26.5 24.2 5.4 26.9 17.0
2 There is always something new to learn in the tourism job 22 52 13 70 66 3.850
% 9.9 23.3 5.8 31.4 29.6
3 Physical working conditions are good in tourism 14 28 26 78 77 4.036
% 6.3 12.6 11.7 35.0 34.5
4 No vocational qualification required in tourism industry 18 28 31 69 77 3.635
% 8.1 12.6 13.9 30.9 34.5
5 There is no sex discrimination in tourism industry 58 88 18 40 19 4.294
% 26.0 39.5 8.1 17.9 8.5
6 Plenty of job openings available in tourism industry 77 62 14 44 26 3.734
% 34.5 27.8 6.3 19.7 11.7
7 There are lots of promotion opportunities in tourism job 69 75 10 42 27 3.151
% 30.9 33.6 4.5 18.8 12.1

Reasons for not joining the tourism industry

No. Statements SD D UD A SA K-S value χ2 p value
 1 No job security in this sector 29 24 31 72 67 4.151 165.704 0.000
% 13.0 10.8 13.9 32.3 30.0
 2 Tourism job is not respected in Omani society 13 19 32 69 90 3.608
% 5.8 8.5 14.3 30.9 40.4
 3 Omanis do not prefer to marry a boy/girl working in tourism industry 10 29 19 90 75 4.322
% 4.5 13.0 8.5 40.4 33.6
 4 There are high risk of accidents in the tourism industry 62 95 27 24 15 4.358
% 27.8 42.6 12.1 10.8 6.7
 5 Working hours are not suitable for regular life 25 34 30 70 64 3.625
% 11.2 15.2 13.5 31.4 28.7
 6 Promotion opportunities are less 8 17 26 66 106 4.010
% 3.6 7.6 11.7 29.6 47.5
 7 Most of the people working in the tourism industry are rude 17 35 33 60 78 3.313
% 7.6 15.7 14.8 26.9 35.0
 8 Pay is low and not sufficient 8 20 30 67 98 3.712
% 3.6 9.0 13.5 30.0 43.9
 9 Fringe benefits (bonus, holiday and meals) are insufficient 3 11 49 70 90 3.596
% 1.3 4.9 22.0 31.4 40.4
10 Working in tourism is in contradiction to my family values/traditional values 17 17 26 62 101 3.749
% 7.6 7.6 11.7 27.8 45.3

Discouraging factors toward tourism

No. Statements SD D UD A SA K-S value χ2 p value
1 No self-interest 22 46 15 29 28 2.831 103.857 0.000
% 9.9 20.6 6.7 13.0 12.6
2 Risk 2 2 25 52 59 2.960
% 0.9 0.9 11.2 23.3 26.5
3 Insufficiency of capital 3 3 20 42 72 3.536
% 1.3 1.3 9.0 18.8 32.3
4 Not sufficient entrepreneurial skills 5 5 22 35 73 3.561
% 2.2 2.2 9.9 15.7 32.7
5 Interested in government jobs 2 4 14 33 87 4.302
% 12.6 30.5 11.2 15.2 30.5

Results of analysis of variance test after elimination

Variables entered/removedb
Model Variables entered Variables removed Method
1 Motivating factors toward tourisma Enter
Model summary
Model R R2 Adjusted R2 SE of estimation
1 0.155c 0.024 0.020 3.725
Model Sum of squares df Mean square F Sig.
Regression 75.214 1 75.214 5.422 0.021b
Residual 3,065.800 221 13.872
Total 3,141.013 222
Model Unstandardized coefficients Standardized coefficients
B SE β t Sig.
(Constant) 27.936 1.068 26.160 0.000
Motivating factors toward tourism 0.114 0.049 0.155 2.328 0.021

Notes: aAll requested variables entered; bdependent variable: reason for selecting tourism; cpredictors: (constant), motivating factors toward tourism


Aksu, A.A. and Koksal, C.D. (2005), “Perceptions and attitudes of tourism students in Turkey”, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 17 No. 5, pp. 436-447.

Al Balushi, A.A. (2014), “The Human Resource Development”, Ministry of Tourism, September, available at: www.comcec.org/UserFiles/File/WorkingGroups/Tourizim4/4-Presentations/4-SuccessStoriesOfTheMemberStates/5-Oman.pdf (accessed June 16, 2015).

Al Shanfari, A. (2012), “Entrepreneurship in Oman: a snapshot of the main challenges”, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Multi-Year Expert Meeting on Enterprise Development Policies and Capacity Building in Science, Technology and Innovation, Geneva, January 16-18.

Bontenbal, M. and Aziz, H. (2013), “Oman’s tourism industry: student career perceptions and attitudes”, Journal of Arabian Studies, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 232-248.

Burrow, J.L., Kleindl, B. and Everard, K.E. (2008), Business Principles and Management, 2nd ed., Thomson Publications, Mason, OH.

Casado, M.A. (1992), “Student expectations of hospitality jobs”, Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, Vol. 33 No. 4, pp. 80-82.

Chilembwe, J.M. and Gondwe, F.W. (2013), “Tourism entrepreneurial development and flight frequency at a destination: case study of Malawi”, GIAP Journals, Vol. 2 No. 1, p. 2, available at: http://giapjournals.com/index.php/ijth/article/view/ijthr212 (accessed July 5, 2015).

Cook, F.D. and Nielson, K. (2011), “Industrializing gulf society”, in Seznec, J.-F. and Kirk, M. (Eds), Industrialization in the Gulf: A Socioeconomic Revolution, Center for Contemporary Arab Studies, Georgetown University/Routledge, London, pp. 198-204.

Cooper, R. (2015), “It’s time to future-proof Australian entrepreneurship”, Australian School Leavers, available at: www.leavingschool.com.au/its-time-to-future-proof-australian-entrepreneurship/ (accessed October 30, 2015).

Ennis, C.A. (2015), “Between trend and necessity: top-down entrepreneurship promotion in Oman and Qatar”, The Muslim World, Vol. 105 No. 1, pp. 116-138.

Gellner, U.B. and Moog, P. (2008), “Who chooses to become an entrepreneur? The Jacks-of all-trades in Social and Human Capital”, Working Paper No. 76, Institute for Strategy and Business Economics, University of Zurich, Zurich, February.

Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) (2009), “GEM-MENA Regional Report”, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor – International Development Research Centre, Cairo, available at: www.gemconsortium.org/docs/download/691 (accessed Ocotber 2, 2015).

Hvidt, M. (2013), “Economic diversification in GCC countries: past record and future trends”, Research Paper, No. 27, Kuwait Programme on Development, Governance and Globalization in the Gulf States, London School of Economics and Political Science, Middle East Centre, January, available at: www.lse.ac.uk (accessed May 11, 2015).

Jenkins, A.K. (2001), “Making a career of it? Hospitality students’ future perspectives: an Anglo-Dutch study”, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 13-20.

Khan, F.R. (2009), “Financial impact on entrepreneurial development across industrial estates of Chennai, State of Tamil Nadu, India”, Journal for Global Business Advancement, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 116-125.

Kirby, D.A. (2004), “Entrepreneurship education: can business schools meet the challenge?”, Education and Training, Vol. 46 Nos 8/9, pp. 510-519.

Koh, K.Y. and Hatten, T.S. (2002), “The tourism entrepreneur: the overlooked player in tourism development studies”, International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 21-48.

Kusluvan, S. (2003), Managing Employee Attitudes and Behaviors in the Tourism and Hospitality Industry, Nova Publications, New York, NY, pp. 12-47.

Middle East Economic Review (2010), “Oman Sets out a Vision for Economic GrowthSupplement, Middle East Economic Review.

Milius, P. and Sarkiene, J. (2008), “Entrepreneurship training for innovative start-ups: the KTC case”, in Van der Sijde, P.C. et al. (Eds), Teaching Entrepreneurship, Contributions to Management Science, Physica-Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg, pp. 23-33, available at: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-7908-2038-6_4# (accessed October 4, 2015).

Ministry of Manpower (2003), “Omanization Plan: Omanization percentages as recommended by the 2nd National Manpower Employment Seminar – Omanization in the travelling and tourism sector”, Ministry of Manpower, Muscat, available at: www.manpower.gov.om/portal/en/OmanisationPlan.aspx#seven (accessed May 25, 2015).

Ministry of National Economy (1995), “Long-Term Development Strategy (1996-2040): Vision for Oman’s Economy – 2040”, Ministry of National Economy, The Sultanate of Oman, available at: www.mone.gov.om/viewPublication.aspx?id=366 (accessed February 2, 2015).

Ministry of Tourism (2015), “Oman Tourism Alternative”, Vision of Ministry of Tourism, available at: www.alternativer.co/omantourism.gov.om/sites-like-omantourism (accessed February 24, 2015).

O’Mahony, B.G. and Sillitoe, J.F. (2001), “Identifying the perceived barriers to participation in tertiary education among hospitality employees”, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 21-29.

Pang, J.M. (2010), “Perceptions of the tourism and hospitality industry by Singapore polytechnic hospitality students: an exploratory study”, UNLV theses, dissertations, professional papers, capstones, Paper No. 700, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, September, available at: http://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations

Parambi, R. (2014), “The case of the missing middle”, available at: www.muscatdaily.com/Archive/Business/SME-Development-in-Oman-2y7u (accessed February 7, 2015).

Pizam, A. (1982), “Tourism manpower: the state of the art”, Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 5-9.

Rampton, J. (2014), “5 Personality Traits of an entrepreneur”, Forbes/Tech, April 14, available at: www.forbes.com/sites#/sites/johnrampton/2014/04/14/5-personality-traits-of-an-entrepreneur/ (accessed October 29, 2015).

Richardson, S. and Anthony, S. (2009), “Undergraduates’ perceptions of tourism and hospitality as a career choice, Griffith Edu, Australia”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 382-388, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2008.10.006 (accessed February 3, 2015).

Roney, S.A., and Oztin, P. (2007), “Career perceptions of undergraduate tourism students: a case study in Turkey”, Journal of Hospitality Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 4-17, available at: www.hlst.heacademy.ac.uk/johlste

Ryan, T., Mottiar, Z. and Quinn, B. (2012), “The dynamic role of entrepreneurs in destination development”, Journal of Tourism and Planning & Development, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 119-131, available at: http://arrow.dit.ie/tfschhmtart/58/ (accessed October 24, 2015).

Sokhalingam, C.P., Manimekalai, N. and Sudhahar, C. (2013), “Entrepreneurial approach to tourism development in Oman”, International Journal of Management, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 48-60.

Tarkenton, F. (2012), “Culture of entitlement threatens entrepreneurship”, Newsmax, September 7, available at: www.newsmax.com/FranTarkenton/culture-entrepreneurs-America-entitlements/2012/09/07/id/451109/ (accessed October 15, 2015).

Times of Oman (2014), “Oman has tourism challenges to tackle”, Times of Oman, August 9, available at: www.timesofoman.com/news/37615/Article-Oman-has-tourism-challenges-to-tackle

World Travel and Tourism Council (WTTC) (2014), “Travel & Tourism Economic Impact 2014 World”, World Travel and Tourism Council, available at: http://caribbean.eclac.org/content/travel-and-tourism-economic-impact-2014 (accessed January 29, 2015).

Further reading

Chellen, H. and Nunkoo, R. (2010), “Understanding students’ commitment to employment in the tourism and hospitality industry”, International Research Symposium in Service Management, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 14-31.

GBCM Research (2011), “Marching towards Stability Oman Economic Outlook”, Gulf Baader Capital Markets SAOC Research, January, available at: www.gbcmoman.net/reports/GBCM (accessed March 13, 2015).

Ministry of Tourism (MOT) (2014), “Tourism Strategy in Oman”, available at: www.omantourism.gov.om/wps/wcm/connect/6ae87e00435ce2f5b1c4fbac65cfb36c/Tourism_Stratigey_in_Oman.doc?MOD=AJPERES&CONVERT_TO=url&CACHEID=6ae87e00435ce2f5b1c4fbac65cfb36c (accessed March 12, 2015).

Corresponding author

Firdouse Rahman Khan can be contacted at: firdouse4u@yahoo.co.uk

Related articles