To read this content please select one of the options below:

Commentary: the unintended consequences of digital service technologies

Mark S. Rosenbaum (Graham School of Management, Saint Xavier University, Chicago, Illinois, USA)
Gabby Walters (The University of Queensland – Saint Lucia Campus, Saint Lucia, Australia)
Karen L. Edwards (Department of Retailing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA)
Claudia Fernanda Gonzalez-Arcos (Department of Business, The University of Queensland – Saint Lucia Campus, Saint Lucia, Australia)

Journal of Services Marketing

ISSN: 0887-6045

Article publication date: 21 December 2021

Issue publication date: 28 March 2022

847

Abstract

Purpose

This commentary puts forth a conceptual framework, referred to as the consumer, organization, government framework of unintended digital technology service failures, that specifies consumer, organizational and governmental shortcomings that result in digital technologies failing in terms of negatively affecting consumer, communal, national and/or global welfare.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors conceptualize an original framework by engaging in a literature review regarding marketplace failures associated with digital service technologies.

Findings

The framework shows that three drivers explain why commercial digital technologies often fail. The first driver highlights misuse or criminal intent from individuals. The second involves organizations failing to prevent or to address technology failures. The third pertains to failures that stem from governmental institutions.

Research limitations/implications

The authors encourage researchers to build on their framework by putting forth research questions. To prevent or lessen opportunities for digital technologies to result in service failures, the authors also offer practitioners a “digital technology service failure audit.” This audit shows how digital technology creators and managers can anticipate and address consumer, organizational and governmental factors that often cause digital service technologies failures.

Social implications

Despite the absence of industry-specific regulations and the existence of some regulatory immunities, digital technology providers have an ethical duty, and may be obligated under applicable tort law principles, to take steps to prevent unintended harm to consumers before launching their service technologies.

Originality/value

This work reveals that digital technologies represent new and different threats to vulnerable consumers, who often rely on, but do not fully understand, these technologies in their everyday living. The framework helps consumers, organizations and government agencies to identify and remedy current and potential instances of harmful digital technologies.

Keywords

Citation

Rosenbaum, M.S., Walters, G., Edwards, K.L. and Gonzalez-Arcos, C.F. (2022), "Commentary: the unintended consequences of digital service technologies", Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 97-109. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-03-2021-0072

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles