Long-run and short-run budgeting: empirical evidence for canada, uk, and usa

Abstract

This paper tests public budgeting as a long-run and short-run process; political decision makers strive to head toward budgetary balance over the long run but are constrained in the short run and follow incremental decision-making. First, the budget equilibrium theory is stated and is used to explain the relationship between revenues and expenditures. Second, the interaction between expenditures and revenues is tested with a vector error correction model for Canada, UK and the US, using annual time series data between 1948 and 2000. The results show that, in the long-run, revenues are the driving force behind the budget in Canada; in the UK expenditures force the budget toward balance. In the short-run, incrementalism occurs in both of these countries. The most interesting finding is for the United States where on-budget revenues and expenditures both push the budget toward balance over the longrun but there is no incrementalism in the process in the short-run. This, of course, is contrary to much of the existing literature.

Citation

Reddick, C.G. and Hassan, S.Y. (2003), "Long-run and short-run budgeting: empirical evidence for canada, uk, and usa", Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 354-379. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-15-03-2003-B003