To read this content please select one of the options below:

A public choice analysis of bond referenda and capital outlays of texas school districts

Carolyn A. Strand (Seattle Pacific University)
Gary Giroux (Texas A&M University)
Jerry Thorne (North Carolina A&T University)

Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management

ISSN: 1096-3367

Article publication date: 1 March 1999

22

Abstract

There were 398 bond referenda by Texas school districts from 1990-95. On average, these received a 58% voter approval rating and almost 75% of the referenda passed. A public choice model suggests many factors related to the voter percentage, including the amount of the bond issue per voter, percent of non-white population, and the amount of state and federal aid in the districts. Districts with Big Six auditors received higher voter percentages ceteris paribus, suggesting increased voter confidence in districts reviewed by brand name auditors. Districts with higher standardized test scores (TAAS) had more favorable votes, which can be interpreted that voters are willing to fund more infrastructure when output performance levels are adequate. A public choice model focusing on capital outlays was successful in explaining spending levels. A Big Six audit was associated with higher capital outlays, although TAAS was insignificant.

Citation

Strand, C.A., Giroux, G. and Thorne, J. (1999), "A public choice analysis of bond referenda and capital outlays of texas school districts", Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 509-532. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-11-04-1999-B001

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 1999 by PrAcademics Press

Related articles