To read this content please select one of the options below:

A Q&A primer and systematic review of meta-analytic reporting in organizational frontline service research

Kristina K. Lindsey-Hall (Department of Marketing, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA)
Eric J. Michel (Department of Management, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA)
Sven Kepes (Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA)
Ji (Miracle) Qi (Department of Marketing, Grand Valley State University, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA)
Laurence G. Weinzimmer (Department of Management and Leadership, Bradley University, Peoria, Illinois, USA)
Anthony R. Wheeler (School of Business Administration, Widener University, Chester, Pennsylvania, USA)
Matthew R. Leon (Department of Management, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA)

Journal of Service Management

ISSN: 1757-5818

Article publication date: 24 November 2023

Issue publication date: 1 December 2023

148

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this manuscript is to provide a step-by-step primer on systematic and meta-analytic reviews across the service field, to systematically analyze the quality of meta-analytic reporting in the service domain, to provide detailed protocols authors may follow when conducting and reporting these analyses and to offer recommendations for future service meta-analyses.

Design/methodology/approach

Eligible frontline service-related meta-analyses published through May 2021 were identified for inclusion (k = 33) through a systematic search of Academic Search Complete, PsycINFO, Business Source Complete, Web of Science, Google Scholar and specific service journals using search terms related to service and meta-analyses.

Findings

An analysis of the existing meta-analyses within the service field, while often providing high-quality results, revealed that the quality of the reporting can be improved in several ways to enhance the replicability of published meta-analyses in the service domain.

Practical implications

This research employs a question-and-answer approach to provide a substantive guide for both properly conducting and properly reporting high-quality meta-analytic research in the service field for scholars at various levels of experience.

Originality/value

This work aggregates best practices from diverse disciplines to create a comprehensive checklist of protocols for conducting and reporting high-quality service meta-analyses while providing additional resources for further exploration.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The ideas developed in this manuscript originated at the Interdisciplinary Service Management Research Forum (ISMRF) hosted by the Northern Illinois University (NIU) College of Business and the Journal of Service Management. This research was supported by the Management Department at the NIU College of Business and the Marketing Department at the E.J. Ourso College of Business at Louisiana State University. The authors are grateful for the support and guidance of the Special Issue Editors, especially Helena Nguyen and Mahesh Subramony, who provided thoughtful feedback throughout the process as well as for the two anonymous reviewers that contributed to the development of the manuscript. The authors would also like to acknowledge Candice Marti and Qiuli Su for their support roles in developing this manuscript. The first two authors contributed equally to this research effort.

Citation

Lindsey-Hall, K.K., Michel, E.J., Kepes, S., Qi, J.(M)., Weinzimmer, L.G., Wheeler, A.R. and Leon, M.R. (2023), "A Q&A primer and systematic review of meta-analytic reporting in organizational frontline service research", Journal of Service Management, Vol. 34 No. 5, pp. 995-1020. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-07-2022-0229

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles