Who are we trying to impress?

John Boswell (Politics Department, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK)
Jack Corbett (Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia)

Journal of Organizational Ethnography

ISSN: 2046-6749

Publication date: 13 July 2015

Abstract

Purpose

Turning laborious ethnographic research into stylized argumentative prose for academic consumption is a painstaking craft. The purpose of this paper is to revisit this perennial issue, and extend a claim the authors have made elsewhere about the inevitably impressionistic, rather than the oft-claimed “systematic”, nature of this task.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors draw and reflect on their own experiences of conducting and navigating across political science, ethnography and interpretation in order to justify and uphold the benefits of impressionism.

Findings

The authors argue that the impressionistic account of writing up fieldwork has important implications for these diverse disciplinary terrains.

Originality/value

The authors develop an argument as to how and why an appreciation of this craft’s impressionistic nature can affect how the authors go about creating, evaluating and ultimately thinking about ethnographic research in foreign disciplines like political science.

Keywords

Citation

John Boswell and Jack Corbett (2015) "Who are we trying to impress?", Journal of Organizational Ethnography, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 223-235

Download as .RIS

DOI

: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOE-08-2014-0030

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2015, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.