Improving client risk classification with machine learning to increase anti-money laundering detection efficiency

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to describe and empirically explore a new method for bank anti-money laundering (AML) systems using machine learning models. Current automated money laundering detection systems are notorious for flagging many false positives, causing bank employees to spend unnecessary time manually checking transactions that do not constitute money laundering. Decreasing the number of false positives can free up resources for investigating money laundering.

Design/methodology/approach

This study uses unique bank data on small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to examine how various client risk classification models can predict future suspicious transactions. This study explores various sources of client risk data and machine-learning approaches.

Findings

Client risk classification models can accurately predict suspicious future transactions. Adding accounting data and credit score information to client risk classification dramatically improves accuracy. This makes it easier to balance the risk of missing suspicious transactions with the need to reduce the number of false positives.

Practical implications

The suggested approach with readily available data sources and a focus on classifying client risk in a dynamic model can help banks significantly improve their efficiency by targeting their AML efforts toward the riskiest clients.

Originality/value

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to empirically explore machine learning in client risk classification, document how machine learning in client risk classification can significantly reduce false positives by incorporating novel, but readily available sources, such as credit risk and accounting data.

Citation

Reite, E.J., Karlsen, J. and Westgaard, E.G. (2024), "Improving client risk classification with machine learning to increase anti-money laundering detection efficiency", Journal of Money Laundering Control, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-03-2024-0040