To read this content please select one of the options below:

The principal–agent problem and its mitigation: a critical historical analysis

Tony Yan (Institute for Marketing Futurology and Philosophy, Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA and Department of Marketing, New Mexico State University College of Business, Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA)
Michael R. Hyman (Institute for Marketing Futurology and Philosophy, Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA and Department of Marketing, New Mexico State University College of Business, Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA)

Journal of Management History

ISSN: 1751-1348

Article publication date: 10 January 2024

85

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical historical analysis of the business (mis)behaviors and influencing factors that discourage enduring cooperation between principals and agents, to introduce strategies that embrace the social values, economic motivation and institutional designs historically adopted to curtail dishonest acts in international business and to inform an improved principal–agent theory that reflects principal–agent reciprocity as shaped by social, political, cultural, economic, strategic and ideological forces

Design/methodology/approach

The critical historical research method is used to analyze Chinese compradors and the foreign companies they served in pre-1949 China.

Findings

Business practitioners can extend orthodox principal–agent theory by scrutinizing the complex interactions between local agents and foreign companies. Instead of agents pursuing their economic interests exclusively, as posited by principal–agent theory, they also may pursue principal-shared interests (as suggested by stewardship theory) because of social norms and cultural values that can affect business-related choices and the social bonds built between principals and agents.

Research limitations/implications

The behaviors of compradors and foreign companies in pre-1949 China suggest international business practices for shaping social bonds between principals and agents and foreign principals’ creative efforts to enhance shared interests with local agents.

Practical implications

Understanding principal–agent theory’s limitations can help international management scholars and practitioners mitigate transaction partners’ dishonest acts.

Originality/value

A critical historical analysis of intermediary businesspeople’s (mis)behavior in pre-1949 (1840–1949) China can inform the generalizability of principal–agent theory and contemporary business strategies for minimizing agents’ dishonest acts.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Funding: No external funding was required.

Conflicts of interest/Competing interests: The authors report no competing interests to declare.

Availability of data and material: Multilevel data were collected.

Code availability: No special software or custom code was required.

Citation

Yan, T. and Hyman, M.R. (2024), "The principal–agent problem and its mitigation: a critical historical analysis", Journal of Management History, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-07-2023-0068

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles